Dramatic Ironies in the Book of Exodus

 [Originally posted in 2012, when we started this website.  This article is part of a doctoral dissertation entitled,  Dramatic Ironies and Illusions in the Book of Exodus: A Profile of a Nation’s Identity, Responsibility, and Destiny,  written by Sinaite ELZ@SK6.]

 

——————-

 

Dramatic Ironies

The contradiction between what one of the characters believes to be true and what the action or plot shows to be true is the typical function of dramatic irony.

 

Frequently, what the character thinks turns out to be true in quite a different way from what he originally meant.  Reversal of intention is a form of dramatic irony in which a character attempts to accomplish one thing and actually accomplishes the opposite.

 

 

The Reversal of Intention as Seen in the Pharaoh and His Plan of Genocide

 

Both the first and second policy of the Pharaoh failed.  They were intended to make the Israelites bitter with bondage.  Clearly demonstrated is the Egyptian’s mind that either they save or destroy the children, or they affect for good or evil the whole destiny of a people.  By employing two Egyptian midwives to destroy the Hebrew children at birth, Shiprah and Puah dared to disobey the royal edict out of divine fear.

 

The drastic means taken to preventIsrael’s increase fired the inventive genius of the victims.  Moses’ parents put him in a basket of papyrus, painted it with bitumen, and floated it among the flags of the bank of theNile.  Pharaoh’s daughter, on a bathing visit, found it and rescued the child; and accepted as a wet nurse, a Hebrew woman, in reality his own mother, cleverly suggested by the baby’s sister, who was standing near the river.  Thus, nursed daily by his own mother as long asnecessary, she left him to be reared in the royal palace of Egypt as the adopted son of Pharaoh’s daughter.

 

 

The Irony of Situation in the Rescue of Moses

 

Moses’ mother, by faith, set him afloat in the Nile River to send him to safety and give him a chance to live.  By physical standards, it is not at all a safe place.  The Nile Rivercould be fraught with danger, full of harmful animals and other life-threatening perils.  In an incredibly ironic twist, the very ruler who sought the death of Hebrew sons took Moses into his court as a son.  It turned out that the daughter of their greatest enemy was inclined to preserve the existence of the one who was to give the greatest blow on the national life of Egypt.

The river that was supposed to be a place of death for male Israelite children became a place of life for Moses.  Tradition says that the Pharaoh’s daughter who found Moses was named Thermoutis.  The outcome was the rather amusing situation wherein the royal treasury of Egypt paid money to a mother to raise her own son; while actually Pharaoh had decreed that no such children should live.

 

 

The Irony of Moses’ Perception of Self and Divine Revelation 

 

 

The same dramatic irony could be applied to Moses in his human evaluation of himself, but his self-realization came as a result of divine revelation.    Moses, the servant of the Lord, had a pedigreed education.  He was raised as a son in the palace of the Pharaoh of Egypt. Egypt was the most powerful nation of the world of that day and possessed the most advanced civilization.  The Bible notes that Moses was “learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and was mighty in words and in deeds” (Acts 7:22).  Since Moses was familiar with Egyptian thought, it would be more reasonable that,      having been trained in Egypt, he would propagate Egyptian beliefs.  Students are normally propagators of the teaching of the instructors and institutions which trained them.

 

It is amazing, therefore, that although Egyptian cosmogony taught that the earth came from the egg, Moses declared, “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth” (Genesis 1:1).  And, although Egyptian astronomy taught that the earth gave light to the sun, Moses declared: “And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the star also. And God set them in the firmament to give light upon the earth” (Genesis 1:16-17). And, notwithstanding the Egyptian anthropology, which said man came from worms along the Nile, Moses declared: “And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Genesis 2:7).  Moses knew what the Egyptian scholars did not know, not because he was a scientist ahead of his time, but because the Egyptian world-view was based upon flawed reasoning of man, and his was based upon direct revelation from God.

 

Rosenthal (2001) noted the Hindu thought about the earth rested upon a turtle which, in turn, rested upon the back of an elephant.  He also stated that the Greeks, whose philosophy is often studied and admired, believed the earth was held upon the shoulders of the giant Atlas. And, the Egyptians thought the earth sat upon five great pillars.

 

In amazing and marked contrast, Rosenthal pointed out that the earliest written book of the Bible declares, “He (God) hangeth the earth upon nothing” (Job 26:7).  Job knew what it would take other men thousands of years to find out – not because he was a great thinker, but because God revealed it to him.

 

 

Moses’ Misconception of a Deliverer 

 

 

The man, who as a self-appointed deliverer, rushed to the rescue of his countrymen.  His imminent consequence drained him of all human self-sufficiency.  He became modest and humble, meekly dependent upon God’s empowering.  When he was asked to fulfill the call of the Lord, he objected to his fitness by presenting his timidity and lack of speech.  What Moses thinks about his role as deliverer of his people turns out to be true in quite a different way.  What he originally meant was to be the deliverer in his capacity as a prince of Egypt.  On the contrary, he accomplished his role after having been equipped as a servant of God.

 

 

The Contrasting Impressions of the Burning Bush

 

The  book of Exodus states the hour that God spoke to Moses within a burning bush.  The irony of this event shows the contrast between what appears to be true and what really is true.  It was a desert area; the bush was dry and sapless.  Everything normal and natural argued for the speedy consumption of that thorn bush.  Yet the truth of God’s presence is manifested in something out of the ordinary.  Moses’ attention was arrested by the recognition of divine intervention.

 

 

The Dramatic Irony of God’s Election

 

The Hebrews, who among all races, was chosen to be the people of God.  They were a motley group of unorganized and uneducated slaves.  It is amazing to note of the selection of God of a little nation.  The same feeble and oppressed people in a tiny territory would later show their great impact on the entire world which is out of proportion to its size.  Egypt had spoiled Israel by forced labor and now Israel was to spoil Egypt when the people were told by Moses to ask jewels of their captors.  The Israelites, having asked of their Egyptian neighbors jewels of silver and gold which they were quite ready to grant and left in haste with such quantities as to have despoiled the Egyptians, was a perfectly legitimate method in that day of treating one’s enemies.  In Exodus, Moses declared that God spoke all these words:  I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of Egypt, out of the house of bondage….And they know that I am the Lord their God, that brought them forth out of Egypt, that I may dwell among them; I am the Lord their God (Exodus 20:2; 29:46). 

 

 

His complete control over nature and man is adequately implied in the statement. The very existence of the nation was on account of this miraculous event. He used the weak of the world, the Hebrew slaves, in fighting the injustice of the strong, the Egyptian  empire, to accomplish his purpose.

 

 

The Ironic Twist of a Hopeful Journey 

 

 

The great exodus, as the scene of more than a million and a half slaves with their possessions marching out of Egypt is insanity by human standards.  The journey had started with such hopes and glad songs as journeys do.  The people started off this chapter of their lives out of bondage not expecting to wander in the wilderness.  The long brutal slave days were over and they were on the march toward God’s Promised Land.  But reality came.  Contrary to all expectations, a long, difficult and dangerous journey lay between them and the Promised Land.  In fact, most of them would die in that foreboding wilderness.

 

 

The Irony of a Religious and Transition Crisis or Passage Exhibited at Mount Sinai

 

The Hebrews learned the new style of life that would mark them as God’s people.  The code and covenant they received were not merely part of a mid-crisis reorientation.  It was during this time that the motley group began to understand its new identity as the people of God.  Yet at the very time Moses was receiving these laws on Mount Sinai, his people were growing uncertain; under the leadership of Aaron, they were so far as to construct the image of another god.  Thus, the entire sojourn in the desert was a time of doubt, hesitation, and failure.

 

 

ELZ@S6K

In Memoriam . . .

 

 

Israel’s Responsibility from the Book of Exodus

 

[Originally posted in 2012.  The author has since passed on to Spiritual Sinai. This article is part of a doctoral dissertation entitled,  Dramatic Ironies and Illusions in the Book of Exodus: A Profile of a Nation’s Identity, Responsibility, and Destiny,  written by Sinaite ELZ@SK6.]

 

————————

 

 

Responsibility is the state of being accountable, the duty or liability to render satisfaction to that which is expected.  Contextually, it is the commitment of a people whom God has delivered; their trustworthiness to the instructions in life that they are commissioned to share to the world as their universal obligation. The sovereign providence of God in fulfilling his promises results in Israel’s responsibility to pass on the religious tradition of monotheism and become priestly mediators to all mankind. The giving of the law made plain the exacting requirements of God’s holiness, thus the nation being holy, and the prescribed sacrifices pointed forward to the redemptive work which was to fulfill the righteousness that is demanded. With all these spiritual values, moral and ethical imperatives, it is the nation’s responsibility to become mediators so that the other nations would respond to God’s covenant demands. The historical setting of the Israelite people is traced to the time of the Exodus, when God acted on their behalf and laid upon them lasting obligations to God and fellow human beings.  Throughout succeeding generations, the prophets reminded them that Israel was bound together as a “whole family” by God’s act of deliverance, that God became known to them in the great events and that their divine “call” had its roots in God’s establishment of the nation.  The Israelites had escaped from physical bondage, but there was still much to be gained in spiritual and moral discipline.

 

It is necessary to see the commandments in their setting for the interpretation of the whole story.  The revelation of the law is significant in that it proceeded from God, through his chosen people, for the government of human life.  The Decalogue was basic to morality as universally admitted.  The first four commandments which have to do with relationship between God and man, are today very largely ignored, while the last six commandments, which has to do with relationships between man and man, are accepted almost universally as basic.  Israel heard God’s command that it was forbidden for other gods to lay claim on its allegiance.  Hence, the earliest way of expressing Israel’s sense of divine sovereignty was in terms of Yahweh’s “jealousy”: 

 

For thou shalt worship no other god: for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God: Lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, and they go a-whoring after their gods, and do sacrifice unto their gods, and one call thee, and thou eat of his sacrifice (Exodus 34:14-15).

 

 

 The covenant ceremony itself was an invitation to decision: to serve Yahweh or not.  The monotheistic element in Mosaic religion goes further by saying that Yahweh is not to be worshiped in the form of any image or likeness.  This was a radical view in the world in which it was believed that the divine presence was concretely represented in an image whether in human or in animal form.  Ancient people believed that the mystery of divinity explodes around them in many forms: natural, animal, or human.  Without some concrete appearance of divinity, they could not have found divine meaning in life.  This intolerance of images, inherited from the Mosaic period, received its supreme expression in later prophecy.  Meanwhile, it is Israel’s responsibility to declare to the world that the holy God of Israel was       invisibly present in the midst of the people: 

 

And He said, Certainly I will be with thee; this shall be a token unto thee, that I have sent thee: When thou hast brought forth the people out of Egypt, ye shall serve God upon this mountain….Now therefore go, and I will be with thy mouth, and teach thee what thou shalt say….And thou shalt speak unto him, and put words in his mouth: and I will be with thy mouth, and with his mouth, and will teach you what ye shall do….And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the Lord:….And I will take you to me for a people, and I will be to you a God: and ye shall know that I am the Lord your God, which bringeth you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians (Exodus 3:12; 4:12, 15; 6:7).

 

 

 

Their song of praise attests to the mighty acts of God to liberate them: 

 

Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song unto the Lord, and spake, saying, I will sing unto the Lord, for he hath triumphed gloriously: the horse and his rider hath he thrown into the sea.  The Lord is my strength and song, and he is become my salvation: he is my God, and I will prepare him an habitation: my father’s God, and I will exalt him.  The Lord is his name (Exodus 15:1-3).

 

 

God manifested himself to Moses in the name, “I AM that I AM” that reveals his unchangeable nature, his faithfulness and purposes.  To this name was added:

 

 And Moses said unto God, Behold when I come to the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you: and they shall say unto me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?  And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you (Exodus 3:14-15).

 

 

As such, God would always prove himself, and as such he wants to be remembered, not only by Israel, but by all generations.  The covenant with Abraham was transferred to Moses’ seed, the promise also, which included all nations in its blessings, was repeated.  It is Israel’s responsibility to pass on the religious instruction to their succeeding generations and to other nations about the God who delivered them.  When offering the first fruits of the harvest at the Feast of Weeks or Pentecost, the worshiper is to confess gratefully that Yahweh brought them out of Egypt with His mighty hand.  When a child asks about the motive for obeying the commandments, the answer is to be given in terms of a recitation of events which happened to the whole community-past, present, and future.

 

The revelation of God in the book of Exodus cast a new light upon the roots of the Hebrews, with the result that it became a period of anticipation and advancement toward the inheritance of the Promised Land.  It also yielded Israel’s full participation in the divine plan that embraces all nations.  The revealing light also fell upon the stories that deal with the potential glory and actual tragedy of human history.

 

The unfolding drama of Yahweh’s historical purpose from the establishment of a nation to the occupation of Canaan is a forceful presentation of faith in Yahweh, the God worshiped byIsrael.  The fundamental experiences that are common to all human beings stem from the initiative and purpose of God.  Above all, Exodus is written in the conviction thatIsrael’s root experiences provide the clue to the meaning of all human history.

 

Freedom from slavery does not mean license.  It never means that every man is to go his own way.  Freedom, to the Israelites, is life under law, which conditions it perfectly.  However, the great march to the Promised Land included a mixed multitude.  This mixed multitude since they neither belong to one flesh nor one race, became a menace to the purposeful march of the people of God. The laws, while given to the Hebrew people, are wide as the race in their value and application. Israel was in the interest of all nations.  In giving the Law to Israel, God’s purpose was that they might be priestly mediators to all mankind.

 

The Hebrews were only one little folk in the midst of great nations.  Though politically small, they embodied within themselves moral and religious ideas that have survived the final downfall and destruction of those proud empires around them.  The Sinai revelation emphasized the usefulness of the covenant for other generations.  With its diversity, successive generations, even in other nations, continued to respond to God’s covenant demand in the changing circumstances of man’s history.

 

The ringing expression, “let my people go” is a spiritual call for all Jewish people today who have not been aware that they are enslaved by a materialistic system and consequently had not had a desire to be freed.  They are still sitting in the flesh pots in the land of Egypt.  The extravagance of eating bread in their “comfort zones” is obviously not a part of God’s plan. The God that had brought them out from Egypt intended to bring them into the Promised Land.  Yahweh’s gift of the land is understood to be a high point in the rehearsal of Israel’s sacred history. Throughout the centuries there was the urge for Jews to go back to the land of their fathers and regain their statehood.  In recent decades, they reclaimed the wilderness, revived their language, built cities and villages, and established a vigorous and ever-growing community.

 

 

ELZ@S6K

In Memoriam

Israel’s Destiny from the Book of Exodus

[Originally posted in 2012, time for a repost.  This article is part of a doctoral dissertation entitled,  Dramatic Ironies and Illusions in the Book of Exodus: A Profile of a Nation’s Identity, Responsibility, and Destiny,  written by Sinaite ELZ@SK6.]

 

————————-

 

Destiny is the purpose or end to which anything is appointed. The destiny of the nation of Israel is examined on God’s intention for its election as the chosen people of God and the consequences of their performance in fulfilling the divine plan. 

 

Israel as God’s firstborn, is to be a blessing to the Gentiles because of their obedience and worthiness.  Their communal experience with God would result to an understanding of the feasts of the Lord that they are required to celebrate.  It is the destiny of Israel to share to the world the knowledge and salvation of God.  The chosen people are destined to a life of sacrifice, preserved by God to reflect His redemptive plan.

 

 

The redemptive context of Exodus expressed itself in two realms, because the slavery of God’s people was both external and internal.  The implied external redemption is from slavery to the alien power known as Egypt.  The implied internal redemption is from the temptation to worship other gods.  Despite Israel’s knowledge of the one true God, and of the ten plagues of God’s judgment on all the gods of Egypt including the Egyptians themselves, the Israelites usually broke their pledges of loyalty to God almost as soon as they made them. 

 

 

Down through the centuries, they were destined to be punished by God because of their rebellion against Him.  The prophets warned them that they would be enslaved by foreign powers if they did not repent and cry out to God for mercy.  Exodus reverberates the Lord as the redeemer who will plead the cause of His enslaved people.

 

It is apparent that in human communities, there stands the story of a people who are bound together primarily by shared experiences rather than natural factors like blood and soil.  National self-consciousness finds expression in the remembrance of events that people had lived through and that have given them a sense of identity and destiny.  The meaningful events are retold and relived from generation to generation.  The people have always been diverse – in theology, in culture, and even in racial characteristics. 

 

The Exodus account is retold and relived many times over to countless generations.  It defines their destiny as a nation, chosen by the “God of their fathers” to accomplish his divine plan in history.  As they were redeemed from the bondage of slavery, their way of life becomes their worship as an act of thanksgiving to the God who had done numerous miracles throughout their national history. The religious ceremonies and customs of Israel, the creation of the tabernacle, the formation of the priesthood, the Mosaic Law, and the sacrificial system all point to the redemption plan of God in human history. Exodus portrays the birth of Israel as a nation that would bring God’s rule on earth.  The redemption and deliverance of Israel from the bondage of slavery requires the obedience to God.  However, the redeemed people need to understand the meanings of the Passover, the Exodus, Moses, the Law, and the Tabernacle in the spiritual plane in order to accomplish God’s purposes.

 

The instructions for the dedication to God of the firstborn are interwoven with the description of the permanent celebration of the Passover.  God had a special claim on the firstborn, both because He had spared them on the night of the Passover in Egypt, and because He had adopted Israel as His firstborn son: “Thus said the Lord, Israel is my son, even my firstborn.” (Exodus 4:22)   That Israel is called “the firstborn” signifies the role of the nation in bringing future blessing to the Gentiles.  But judgment must begin at the household of God, and no one is fit to be employed as an instrument for God who in any way lives in neglect of His commandments.

 

The plan of God to make Israel a kingdom of priests and a holy nation describes the character of God’s people and their destination.  The mission of Israel is to act as priests to the nations, mediating between God and man, to be the intermediary of the knowledge and salvation of God. Israel is to be made holy through the covenant with God, which provided forgiveness and discipline of His law.  If God showed His greatness and glory in creation, the way of His holiness was among the chosen people.

 

On the one hand, God fulfilled the destiny of the Hebrews by preserving them and their faith and leading them to a land flowing with milk and honey,” (Exodus 3:17) just as He had promised.  On the other hand, it was Moses’ personal destiny to lead the Hebrews out of Egyptian bondage.  He was saved from the Pharaoh’s genocide so that he could fulfill that destiny.  His life was then filled by God with many rich and valuable experiences that served him well as God’s appointed deliverer.

 

 

ELZ@S6K

 

In Memoriam

REVISIT: Is there true justice on earth?

Image from passion-not-perfection.tumblr.com

Image from passion-not-perfection.tumblr.com

[First posted in 2013; reposting on the 29th death anniversary of the author’s sibling.  Most topics/posts in this website are relevant for all people and all times; nothing is ever “outdated”, for we write about what the Hebrew Bible is about:  God and His Way of Life, and humanity and the choices that we make in relation to Him and His Laws.  There are always lessons to be learned from obedience or disobedience, particularly in relation to  Divinely-ordained laws that govern human relationships. 

When will people learn the simple lesson that deeds—whether good or bad—have consequences, not only for the “doer” but for the “other” for whose benefit are Commandments 5-10.  People have not changed much since the creation of the first couple or even later, since the giving of the TORAH on Sinai to a people formed and chosen for what purpose?   The Creator really took a chance when He decided to share his “IMAGE” with beings who have no foreknowledge of consequences, but provided with a set of guidelines for how to live in a world where the laws governing cause and effect are definitely “in effect” . . . though sometimes it doesn’t appear so, from our limited human vantage point.  Hence, the title of this post. —Admin1]

 

—————————

 

 This post was occasioned by the visit of some Christian missionaries (who were still friendly with me, perhaps because at the time, they had not heard about Sinai 6000).  I welcomed them with as much warmth as they hugged and greeted me.  Since it was our Christian faith that first brought us together decades ago, naturally the conversation immediately centered on updates about how many souls were “saved” as a result of their evangelistic mission. I had no statistics to show off, since the Torah does not speak in terms of “saved” and “unsaved” but in terms of  “choose today whom you will serve” and consequences of choice.

 

Christ-centered believers “evangelize” about being “saved” simply by “believing in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior”, followed by “letting him enter into your heart”, then “waiting for the Holy Spirit to empower you to avoid temptation, not succumb to habitual sins, get you out of your bondage”, and so on.  Belonging to a church or fellowship, regular bible study, Sunday worship, spreading the faith by witnessing to others,  all become part of the new life of the “new creature” in Christ Jesus. 

 

Many actively choose their ‘ministry’ depending on how the “Holy Spirit” has gifted them; some are into charity,  teaching bible, music for worship, visiting the sick, etc., all wonderful other-centered faith-in-action that benefit the underprivileged sector in society. This is all not only laudable, but admirable, and indeed touch the hearts of the recipients of God’s grace through such service-oriented religious flock.

 

 This helping and reaching out and such self-giving quality in Christians is what is so attractive to non-believers, so much so, they want to ‘have’ the same faith.  Christians are at the forefront of any HELP brigade, be they Catholic nuns or sisters of charity, international missions of Campus Crusade, Youth with a Mission, 700 Club, etc.  

 

No doubt they are fulfilling the TORAH of YHWH which is full of reminders to help the needy.  For one,  Yeshayahu / Isaiah 58:10-11

And if you draw out your soul to the hungry,

and satisfy the afflicted soul;

then shall your light rise in obscurity

and your darkness be as the noonday:

And YHVH shall guide you continually,

and satisfy your soul in drought,

and make fat your bones:

and you shall be like a watered garden,

and like a spring of water, whose waters fail not. 

 

 

Is YHWH pleased that with the networking of people of differing faiths, the needy are blessed?  No doubt.  

 

Are those sincerely carrying out these wonderful deeds that benefit others just as blessed?  No doubt.  

 

Do all these bring glory to YHWH and is His Name praised?   Hmmmm . . . this last Q  is for you to answer, dear reader.

 

I happen to have been at the receiving end of such kindness, graciousness, and hospitality from this visiting Christian friend at a time when I was on the ‘needy’ side, if only for assistance in settling down in a strange new environment.  I have been and continue to be grateful to this lovely person “SH” who went far beyond what was necessary to accommodate a relocator’s basic needs for housing, transportation, directions, possible job opportunities in the area, etc.

 

Image from www.walkthecross.com

Image from www.walkthecross.com

“SH” suddenly surfaced on my turf later,  accompanied by two missionary friends. She had been the conduit of donations from US and Canada for an orphanage in my city but over and above that, she and the other missionaries were also into “prison ministry”.  I have always felt guilty about how I fell short in my service to God and fellowmen compared to “SH” and her missionary friends.  They shared with pride many stories about conversions of prisoners and how these converts were not only “saved in Jesus” but also became pastors, in prison and out.  

 

I asked a simple question:  “How is it that every converted prisoner becomes a ‘pastor’?”  Does pastoring not require some training and much biblical knowledge? Is it that easy to become a pastor?  They said there were bible schools in prisons, thanks to the effort of those with a ‘prison ministry’.  Well and good, changed lives mean change in direction, in or out of prison.  Hopefully so but not always so.  I am sure “real conversions” do happen, but I would not be surprised if there were also ulterior motives on the part of the converted convict or convicted convert.

 

Actually I have personally known and have heard about pastors who were former convicts.   Talking about their former life was always preliminary to why one should marvel at the dramatic turnabout in their direction. As far as I knew, many of them did succeed in “changing lives” of other people who were inspired that despite their ex-convict background, they believed that Jesus changed their hearts. But I also heard from “SH” herself,  of at least one prison pastor who married one of these missionary women, got his parole, got out of prison, but reverted to his former lifestyle and in fact got a second wife.  

 

With nothing to do and miserable in overcrowded prisons, I suppose if I were a prisoner,  I would most likely hang around these kind and gracious missionaries who not only bring ‘the good news of salvation in Jesus Christ’  but also other goodies sometimes!  Surely my ‘bible connection’ besides good behavior will eventually get on record and draw the attention of prison administrators,  perhaps one way to merit me the possibility of parole.  

 

The reason I was a bit skeptical was because the gang of murderers of my youngest brother were all on this ‘salvation-for-prisoners’ ministry. [Please read Where was God when . . . .]  According to “SH” and her missionary friends, yes,  my brother’s murderers were converted, and one even became a pastor.  They recounted with pride that these killers have said in their testimonies that they were happy to have ended up in prison where they finally met the Lord Jesus through these missionaries, because had they not committed the last and final dastardly crime (toward my brother) for which they were finally apprehended, brought to trial and convicted, they would still be continuing their non-stop criminal activities of robbery, rape, murder.

 

Image from booksforevangelism.org

Image from booksforevangelism.org

Missionaries add to their accomplishments such happy endings, especially for transformed murderers whose lives had changed while being imprisoned, but I had to articulate my sentiments to my guests with some sarcasm:  “Well, ‘hallelujah PTL’  for them”,  but I had much difficulty swallowing the drift of their testimonies, considering the torture they subjected my brother to, making him like the virtual sacrificial lamb on God’s altar just so they could–after 17 years in a supposed life imprisonment sentence–connect with the Christian savior, be ‘saved’ and paroled, in that order.  So they were all out free with a new life while my brother was still dead.  That elicited an uncomfortable silence.

 

One of them, “RR” in fact was the deliverer of a letter addressed to me from the convict who inflicted the 17 stab wounds, leaving the bayonet on his victim’s neck as if to indicate to us that it was the kindest cut of all.  That letter was the second I had received from this man; the first was when he had first “met Jesus his Lord and Savior” 12 years ago in which I was lectured about forgiveness but never asking forgiveness nor admitting to the crime!  I ignored that letter.  

 

This second one was more of the same, except there was an extra request that our family must not hinder the prospect of his being granted parole. Was there admission of guilt, regret, or a plea for forgiveness?  None.

 

Then I was informed that the gang of murderers were out, “pastors” you see, saved by the blood of the Christian god-man.  John F. Kennedy is noted to have quipped “forgive your enemies but don’t forget their names.”  

 

Because Jesus lectured “love your enemies,”  perhaps the most difficult test I underwent as a Christian at the time was to obey that strange command, found in NT (but not in OT as I just discovered later). 

 

So what did my sister and I do way back then? We donated Christian bibles to the local jail where they were imprisoned during trial, and prayed for their conversion.  This was 1992.  Lo and behold, ‘answered prayers’ in year 2013 ! 

 

No fast, time will tell!

Image from simplyreference.com

Image from simplyreference.com

My thinking has since been radically changed by my exposure to the TORAH of YHWH.  I do know that the worst sinner is pardoned by the God of TNK on the basis of true repentance, turning one’s life around from the destructive direction previously undertaken.  Confession is part of it, and asking forgiveness from those one has harmed or sinned against.

 

What kind of restitution could be made?  I have yet to hear of these reformed convicts writing the children and widow of my brother for depriving them of a loving father and husband, one of the precious lives that was snuffed so prematurely by these hoodlums who had already wreaked havoc on many lives but never reached the courts of justice until our family took it upon ourselves to see to it that justice is served for our brother and all the other victims.

 

Seventeen years in prison, ‘met Jesus’, born again, paroled.  I pray they learn to live TORAH from then on. It is in the prequel to the New Testament from which they will preach as pastors.  They might discover that the justice of YHWH, while it might not be well executed by imperfect court systems of men is well expressed in many texts, such as Yeshayahu/Isaiah 1:16

 

Wash yourselves, purify yourselves,

remove the evil of your deeds from before My eyes;

cease doing evil.

Learn to do good, seek justice,

vindicate the victim,

render to the orphan, take up the grievance of the widow.

 

And let us not forget Bereshiyth 8:9:  

 

Whoever sheds the blood of man,

by man shall his blood be shed;

for in the image of God He made man. 

 

The Artscroll comment on this verse:

 

 

“The Torah places another limitation

on man’s right to take a life:

God will demand an accounting

from one who spills his own blood,

For a human being’s life

belongs not to him

but to God.”

 

 

  NSB@S6K

logoSig-4_16colors

 

Picked this up from a Sinaite’s FaceBook Page . . .

Image may contain: 1 person

Pacific Israel Rim – Support

April 23 · 

I was going to cry when I read this speech from the Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu, but at the end I said, “Glory to the God of Israel”

Let’s read together:

Mr. Netanyahu said:
Only 70 years ago! The Jews were taken to slaughter like sheep.
🔵 60 years ago!
🔵 no country. No Army.

Seven Arab countries declared war on the small Jewish state, only a few hours after its creation!
🔵 we were 650,000 Jews against the many millions in the Arab world!

There was no strong IDF(Israel Defense Forces).

No powerful air force to save us but only brave Jewish people with nowhere else to go.
🔵Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, Libya, Saudi Arabia all attacked at the same time.
🔵the country that the United Nations gave us was a 65 % desert.

🔵 35 years ago! We fought the three most Powerful armies in the middle east, and we swept them in six days.

We fought against various coalitions of Arab countries, which had modern armies and many Soviet weapons, and we have always beaten them!

Today we have:

🔵 a State (Country)
🔵 an Army,
🔵 a Powerful Air Force,
🔵 A State-of-the-Art Economy with exports worth billions of dollars.
🔵 Intel – Microsoft – ibm & many high-tech companies develop cutting edge products in Israel
🔵 our doctors receive awards for medical research.
🔵 we make the desert bloom, and sell oranges, flowers and vegetables all over the world.

🔵 Israel has sent its own satellites into space!

🔵 three satellites at the same time!
🔵 We are proud to be at the same rank as:
🔵 The United States, which has 250 million inhabitants,
🔵 Russia, which has 200 million inhabitants,
🔵 China, which has 1.3 billion inhabitants;
🔵 Europeans – France, Great Britain, Germany – with 350 million inhabitants.
🔵 the only countries in the world to send objects into space!

🔵 and say that only 60 years ago,
🔵 we were led, ashamed and hopeless, to slaughter!
🔵 we have experienced the smoking ruins of Europe,
🔵 we have won our wars here in Israel with less than nothing

🔵 we built our little “Empire” from nothing.

Who’s Hamas to scare me?
🔴 to terrify me?
🔴 you make me laugh!
🔴 Passover was celebrated;

Let’s not forget what Passover is:
🔴 we survived Pharaoh,
🔴 we survived the Greeks,
🔴 we survived the Romans,
🔴 we survived the inquisition in Spain,
🔴 we have the pogroms in Russia,
🔴 we survived Hitler,
🔴 we survived the Germans,
🔴 we survived the Holocaust,
🔴 we survived the armies of seven Arab countries,
🔴 we survived Saddam.
🔴 we will survive the enemies present

Think of any time in human history 

Think about it, for us, the Jewish people,
🔷 the situation has never been better!
🔷 then let’s face the world,

Let us remember:
🔶 all nations, empires or cultures
🔶 who once tried to destroy us,
🔶 no longer exist today – while we still live!
🔶 Egypt?
🔶 Babylon?
🔶 the Greeks?
🔶 Alexander of Macedonia?
🔶 The Romans? (does anyone still speak Latin these days? )
🔶 The Third Reich?

And look at us

🔵 The slaves of Egypt,
🔵 The People of Moses
🔵 The Nation of the Bible,
🔵 We are still here,

And Hebrew is still the official language of the State of Israel today:

🚩 from the time of the Bible and now!
🚩 Arabs don’t know yet,
🚩 but they will learn that there is a God.
🚩 as long as we keep our identity, we are forever.

So forgive us for not worrying,
🔶 not to cry,
🔶 not to be afraid.
🔶 things are fine here.
🔶 they could certainly get better,

However:
🔴 Don’t believe the media,
🔴 they don’t tell you alot of good things about Israel
🔴 celebrations continue to take place in Israel,
🔴 people continue to live,
🔴 people keep coming out,
🔴 people continue to see friends.

Some claim our morale is low.
🔵 so what?

Only because we mourn our deaths while our enemies rejoice in the blood shed & war.

🔵 that is why we will win, in the end.

The God of Israel created the Heaven’s and the Earth.
The Guardian of Israel never slumbers or sleep! The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Forward this speech to the whole community,
💙 and to people around the world.
💜 they are part of our strength

Share on your walls with your friends 💞💟💖

Jewish History by a Christian Historian

Image from amazon.com

Image from amazon.com

[First posted October 24,2012; here’s the original Introduction:  This recommended read is:  A HISTORY OF THE JEWS by Paul Johnson.

 

One reviewer, Merle Rubin of Christian Science Monitor says it best:

 “An absorbing, provocative, well-written, often moving book, an insightful and impassioned blend of history and myth, story and interpretation”  (highlights added).

 

I most likely would never have picked out this book if I had wanted to learn about the history of the Jews, and in fact, I didn’t. It was passed on to me by my catholic brother from the library of a retiree I have never met, who enjoys going to estate sales to buy old books.  This book however, is not old but new; he bought it for $17.99 during a visit to the USA, and brought it all the way back to the Philippines.  I find it intriguing that someone would do that for the sister of one of his exercise buddies (a neighborhood walk/aerobics & breakfast club) because this is the 4th book about Jews that I’ve inherited through brother dear.

 

Now about the book:  details included in any book should be read; they help you understand something about the author, such as:

 

 

“This book is dedicated to the memory of Hugh Fraser, a true Christian gentleman and lifelong friend of the Jews.” 

 

That’s a nice tribute, whoever Hugh Fraser was.  “A friend of the Jews” is a good attachment to anyone’s name.

 

The author himself explains his version of Jewish history:  “a personal interpretation”  with the excuse “the opinions expressed (and any errors) are my own,” and he gives a grateful acknowledgment of his Jewish sources.

 

Prologue and Epilogue are bookends that give an idea of what the book covers in between. so excerpts from these two are all we will present here. Reformatted for posting.–Admin1]

 

————————

 

Prologue

 

Why have I written a history of the Jews?  There are four reasons.

  • The first is sheer curiosity.

When I was working on my History of Christianity, I became aware for the first time in my life of the magnitude of the debt Christianity owes to Judaism.  It was not, as I had been taught to suppose, that the New Testament replaced the Old; rather, that Christianity gave a fresh interpretation to an ancient form of monotheism, gradually evolving into a different religion but carrying with it much of the moral and dogmatic theology, the liturgy, the institutions and the fundamental concepts of its forebear.  I thereupon determined, should opportunity occur, to write about the people who had given birth to my faith, to explore their history back to its origins and forward to the present day, and to make up my own mind about their role and significance.  The world tended to see the Jews as a race which had ruled itself in antiquity and set down its records int he Bible; had then gone underground for many centuries; had emerged at last only to be slaughtered by the Nazis; and, finally, had created a state of its own, controversial and beleaguered.  But these were merely salient episodes, I wanted to link them together, to find and study the missing portions, assemble them into a whole, and make sense of it.

  • My second reason was the excitement I found in the sheer span of Jewish history.

From the time of Abraham up to the present covers the best part of four millennia.  That is more than three-quarters of the entire history of civilized humanity.  I am a historian who believes in long continuities and delights in tracing them.  The Jews created a separate and specific identity earlier than most any other people which still survives.  They have maintained it, amid appalling adversities, right up to the present.  Whence came this extraordinary endurance?  What was the particular strength of the all-consuming idea which made the Jews different and kept them homogeneous?  Did its continuing power lie in its essential immutability, or its capacity to adapt, or both?  These are sinewy themes with which to grapple.

 

  • My third reason was that Jewish history covers not only vast tracts of time but huge areas.

The Jews have penetrated many societies and left their mark on all of them.  Writing a history of the Jews is almost like writing a history of the world, but from a highly peculiar angle of vision.  It is world history seen from the viewpoint of a learned and intelligent victim.  So the effort to grasp history as it appeared to the Jews produces illuminating insights.  Dietrich Bonhoeffer noticed this same effect when he was in a Nazi Prison.  ‘We have learned’, he wrote in 1942, ‘to see the great events of world history from below, from the perspective of those who are excluded, under suspicion, ill-treated, powerless, oppressed and scorned, in short those who suffer.’  He found it, he said, ‘an experience of incomparable value’.  The historian finds a similar merit in telling the story of the Jews:  it adds to history the new and revealing dimension of the underdog.

  • Finally, the book gave me the chance to reconsider objectively, in the light of a study covering nearly 4,000 years, the most intractable of all human questions:
    • What are we on earth for?
    • Is history merely a series of events whose sum is meaningless?
    • Is there no fundamental moral difference between the history of the human race and the history, say, of ants?
    • Or is there a providential plan of which we are, however humbly, the agents?

No people has ever insisted more firmly than the Jews that history has a purpose and humanity a destiny.  At a very early stage in their collective existence they believed they had detected a divine scheme for the human race, of which their own society was to be a pilot.  They worked out their role in immense detail.  They clung to it with heroic persistence in the face of savage suffering.  Many of them believe it still.  Others transmitted it into Promethean endeavors to raise our condition by purely human means.  The Jewish vision became the prototype of many similar grand designs for humanity, both divine and man-made.  The Jews, therefore, stand right at the center of the perennial attempt to give human life the dignity of a purpose.  Does their own history suggest that such attempts are worth making?  Or does it reveal their essential futility?  The account that follows, the result of my own inquiry, will I hope help its readers to answer these questions for themselves.

 

 

Contents 

  • Part One:  Israelites
  • Part Two: Judaism
  • Part Three:  Cathedocracy
  • Part Four:  Ghetto
  • Part Five: Emancipation
  • Part Six:  Holocaust
  • Part Seven:  Zion

 

Epilogue

 

In his Antiquities of the JewsJosephus describes Abraham as ‘a man of great sagacity’ who had ‘higher notions of virtue than others of his time’.  He therefore ‘determined to change completely the views which all then had about God’.  One way of summing up 4,000 years of Jewish history is to ask ourselves what would have happened to the human race if Abraham had not been a man of great sagacity, or if he had stayed in Ur and kept his higher notions to himself, and no specific Jewish people had come into being.  Certainly the world without the Jews would have been a radically different place.  Humanity might eventually have stumbled upon all the Jewish insights.  But we cannot be sure.  All the great conceptual discoveries of the intellect seem obvious and inescapable once they have been revealed, but it requires a special genius to formulate them for the first time.  The Jews had this gift.

 

To them we owe—

  • the idea of equality before the law, both divine and human;
  • of the sanctity of life and the dignity of the human person;
  • of the individual conscience and so of personal redemption;
  • of the collective conscience and so of social responsibility;
  • of peace as an abstract ideal
  • and love as the foundation of justice,
  • and many other items which constitute the basic moral furniture of the human mind.

 

Without the Jews it might have been a much emptier place.

Above all, the Jews taught us how to rationalize the unknown.  The result was monotheism and the three great religions which profess it.  It is almost beyond our capacity to imagine how the world would have fared if they had never emerged.  Nor did the intellectual penetration of the unknown stop at the idea of one God.  Indeed monotheism itself can be seen as a milestone on the road which leads people to dispense with God altogether.  The Jews first rationalized the pantheon of idols into one Supreme Being; then began the process of rationalizing Him out of existence. In the ultimate perspective of history, Abraham and Moses may come to seem less important than Spinoza.  For the Jewish impact on humanity has been protean.

  • In antiquity they were the great innovators in religion and morals.
  • In the Dark Ages and early medieval Europe they were still an advanced people transmitting scarce knowledge and technology.
  • Gradually they were pushed from the van and fell behind until, by the end of the 18th century, they were seen as a bedraggled and obscurantist rearguard in the march of civilized humanity.
  • Breaking out of their ghettos, they once more transformed human thinking, this time in the secular sphere.
  • Much of the mental furniture of the modern world too is of Jewish fabrication.

 

The Jews were not just innovators.  They were also exemplars and epitomizers of the human condition.  They seemed to present all the inescapable dilemmas of man in a heightened and clarified form.

  • They were the quintessential ‘strangers and sojourners’.  But are we not all such on this planet, of which we possess a mere leasehold of threescore and ten?
  • The Jews are the emblem of homeless and vulnerable humanity.  But is not the whole earth no more than a temporary transit-camp?
  • The Jews were fierce idealists striving for perfection, and at the same time fragile men and women yearning for flesh-pots and safety.
  • They wanted to obey God’s impossible law, and they wanted to stay alive too.

 

Therein lay the dilemma of the Jewish commonwealths in antiquity, trying to combine the moral excellence of a theocracy with the practical demands of a state capable of defending itself.  The dilemma has been recreated in our own time in the shape of Israel, founded to realize a humanitarian ideal, discovering in practice that it must be ruthless simply to survive in a hostile world.  But is not this a recurrent problem which affects all human societies?  We all want to build Jerusalem.  We all drift back towards the Cities of the Plain.  It seems to be the role of the Jews to focus and dramatize these common experiences of mankind, and to turn their particular fate into a universal moral.  But if the Jews have this role, who wrote it for them?

Historians should beware of seeking providential patterns in events.  They are all to easily found, for we are credulous creatures, born to believe, and equipped with powerful imaginations which readily produce and rearrange data to suit any transcendental scheme.  Yet excessive skepticism can produce as serious a distortion as credulity.  The historian should take into account all forms of evidence, including those which are or appear to be metaphysical.

 

If the earliest Jews were able to survey, with us, the history of their progeny, they would find nothing surprising in it.  They always knew that Jewish society was appointed to be a pilot-project for the entire human race.  That Jewish dilemmas, dramas and catastrophes should be exemplary, larger than life, would seem only natural to them.  That Jews should over the millennia attract such unparalleled, indeed inexplicable, hatred would be regrettable but only to be expected.  Above all, that the Jews should still survive, when all those other ancient people were transmuted or vanished into the oubliettes of history, was wholly predictable.  How could it be otherwise?  Providence decreed it and the Jews obeyed.

 

The historian may say:  there is no such thing as providence.  Possibly not.  But human confidence in such a historical dynamic, if it is strong and tenacious enough, is a force in itself, which pushes on the hinge of events and moves them.  The Jews believed they were a special people with such unanimity and passion, and over so long a span, that they became one.  They did indeed have a role because they wrote it for themselves.  Therein, perhaps, lies the key to their story.

 

MUST READ: The Christ Myth Theory and Its Problems

Image from amazon.com

Image from amazon.com

[First posted Sept. 2, 2012.  Here’s the original Introduction:  “This is a book written by Robert   M. Price, published in 2011, downloadable as ebook from amazon.com.} —  Admin1.]

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:  Robert M. Price (Selma, NC), professor of scriptural studies at the Johnnie Colemon Theological Seminary, is the editor (with Jeffery Jay Lowder) of The Empty Tomb: Jesus Beyond the Grave and the Journal of Higher Criticism. He is also the author of Top Secret: The Truth Behind Today’s Pop Mysticisms; The Paperback Apocalypse: How the Christian Church Was Left Behind; The Reason-Driven Life: What Am I Here on Earth For? and many other works.

 

Sample Reviews:
Robert M Price ends this brilliant book with the words “Jesus [probably] never walked the earth,” and he backs up this assertion with abundant evidence and persuasive argument, so that, I believe, any unbiased and intelligent reader would either have to agree with him or at least be strongly swayed towards his conclusion.
In an amazing 205 page chapter he puts one after another New Testament story about Jesus side by side with one or more Old Testament stories, so the reader can see clearly for himself that the NT stories are only rewritten or reworked OT stories; and as Dr Price points out, if Jesus really existed, why didn’t the NT authors write about him instead of describing him only in terms of ancient stories about other biblical figures? In addition, Price points out that the Jesus story fits a common story pattern of mythic heroes in ancient times, and that there is no good historical documentation that he ever existed as a real person. Others, such as Earl Doherty, have also written good books arguing that Jesus was only a myth, but Price’s book is a valuable addition to the field, and I recommend it to anyone interested in finding out the truth about the subject.
My only problem with the book is that sometimes Dr. Price writes a bit densely and woodenly, but for the most part it is clearly and well written.

I first started reading Dr. Price’s work as a theology student; his research was beginning of my own pursuit of the historical Jesus which led to my book Jesus Potter Harry Christ: The Surprising Parallels that Expose the Truth about the Historical Jesus, the Christ Myth, and the Secret Origins of Christianity. I feel his frustration in passages like “At the outset of a controversial essay, let me try for a moment to make it easier for readers to resist the temptation to dismiss what I say based on tired stereotypes.”Price has the academic background and intelligence to provide spot-on arguments exploring the historical-mythical Christ dilemma. He’s fighting against an army of Bible Scholars who refuse to change their beliefs about the historical Jesus and leading the charge for a thought reform that would undermine Christian tradition. I agree with him that this overhaul is necessary and worthwhile:”If we appeal instead to “received opinion” or “the consensus {30} of scholars,” we are merely abdicating our own responsibility, as well as committing the fallacy of Appeal to the Majority.”Some other gems include:

“And the Principle of Analogy applies here as well: which do the gospel stories resemble more closely: contemporary experience or ancient miracle tales? Which is more likely: that a man walked on water, glowed like the sun, and rose from the dead, or that someone has rewritten a bunch of well-known miracle stories?”Beginners to Christ Myth Theory might be intimidated by the scholasticism of this book; but for skeptics looking for a deeper understanding of the issues, well worth reading.

 ——————————————————————
 
 INTRODUCTION:  The Quest of the Mythical Jesus . . . .
 
When, long ago, I first learned that some theorized that Jesus had never existed as an historical figure, I dismissed that notion as mere crankism, as most still do.  Indeed, Rudolf Bultmann, supposedly the arch-skeptic, quipped that no sane person could doubt that Jesus existed (though he himself came surprisingly close to the same opinion, as did Paul Tillich).  For a number of years I held a more or less Bultmannian estimate of the historical Jesus as a prophet heralding the arrival of the eschatological Kingdom of God, an end to which his parables, faith healings and exorcisms were directed.  Jesus had, I thought, predicted the coming of the Son of Man, an angelic figure who should raise the dead and judge mankind.  When his cleansing of the temple invited the unforgiving ire of the Sadducee establishment, in cahoots with the Romans, he sealed his own doom.  He died by crucifixion, and a few days later his disciples began experiencing visions of him raised from the dead.  They concluded that he himself was now to be considered the Son of Man, and they expected his messianic advent in the near future.

 

From this eminently reasonable position (its cogency reinforced by the postmortem unfolding of the messiahship of Lubavitcher Rebbe Menachem Mendel Schneerson) I eventually found myself gravitating to that crazy view, that Jesus hadn’t existed, that he was mythic all the way down, like Hercules.  I do not hold it as a dogma.  I do not prefer that it be true.  It is just that the evidence now seems to me to point that way.  The burden of proof would seem to belong with those who believe there was a historical man named Jesus.  I fully admit and remind the reader that all historical hypotheses are provisional and tentative.  This one certainly is.  And yet I do favor it.  Why?

 

I remember first encountering the notion that the Jesus saga was formally similar to the Mediterranean dying and rising god myths of saviors including Attis, Adonis, Tammuz/Dumuzi, Dionysus, Osiris, and Baal.  I felt almost at once that the jig was up.  I could not explain away those parallels, parallels that went right to the heart of the thing.  I felt momentary respite when I read the false reassurances of Bruce M. Metzger (may this great man rest in peace), J.N.D. Anderson, Edwin Yamauchi (may I someday gain a tenth of his knowledge!), and others that these parallels were false or that they were later in origin, perhaps even borrowed by the pagans from Christianity.  But it did not take long to discover the spurious nature of such apologetical special pleading.  There was ample and early pre-Christian evidence for the dying and rising gods.  The parallels were very close. And it was simply not true that no one ever held that, like Jesus, these saviors had been historical figures.  And if the ancient apologists had not known that the pagan parallels were pre-Christian, why on earth would they have mounted a suicidal argument that Satan counterfeited the real dying and rising god ahead of time.  That is like the fundamentalists of the 19th century arguing desperately that God crated fossils of dinosaurs that had never existed.

 

And yet, all of this scarcely proved that Jesus had not existed at all.  Bultmann freely admitted that such myths clothed and shaped the form of resurrection belief among the early Christians, but he felt there had actually been certain Easter morning experiences, visions that might have given rise to a different explanation in a different age.  I now think Bultmann’s argument runs afoul of Ockham’s razor, since it posits redundant explanations.  If you recognize the recurrence of the pagan savior myth in the Christian proclamation, then no need remains to suggest an initial “Big Bang” (Burton L. Mack) of an Easter Morning Experience of the First Disciples.

 

G.A. Wells, like his predecessors advocating the Christ Myth theory, discounted the gospel story of an historical Jesus, an itinerant teacher and miracle worker, on the grounds of its seeming absence from the Epistle literature, earlier than the gospels, implying that there was no Jesus tradition floating around in either oral or written form at the time Paul and Peter were writing letters.  All they referred to was a supernatural Son of God who descended from heaven to vanquish the evil angels ruling the world, then returned heavenward to reign in divine glory till his second advent.  Had Paul known of the teaching of Jesus, why did he not quote it when it would have settled this and that controversial question (e.g., paying Roman Taxes, celibacy for the Kingdom, congregational discipline)?  Why does he seem to refer to occasional “commands of the Lord” in a manner so vague as to suggest charismatic revelations to himself?  Why does he never mention Jesus having healed the sick or done miracles?  How can he say the Roman Empire never punishes the righteous, only the wicked?

 

This is a weighty argument, but another makes it almost superfluous.  Take the gospel Jesus story as a whole, whether earlier or later than the Jesus story of the Epistles; it is part and parcel of the Mythic Hero Archetype shared by cultures and religions worldwide and throughout history (Lord Raglan and then, later, Alan Dundes showed this in great detail).  Leave the gospel story on the table, then.  You still do not have any truly historical data.  There is no “secular” biographical information about Jesus.  Even the seeming “facts” irrelevant to faith dissolve upon scrutiny.  Did he live in Nazareth?  Or was that a tendentious reinterpretation of the Nazorean sect?  Did he work some years as a carpenter?  Or does that story not rather reflect the crowd’s pegging him as an expert in scripture, a la the Rabbinic proverb, “Not even a carpenter, or a carpenter’s son could solve this one!”?  Was his father named Joseph, or is that a historicization of his earlier designation as the Galilean Messiah, Messiah ben Joseph?  On and on it goes, and when we are done, there is nothing left of Jesus that does not appear to serve all too clearly the interests of faith, the faith even of a rival, hence contradictory, factions among early Christians.

 

I admit that a historical hero might attract to himself the standard flattering legends and myths to the extent that the original lines of the figure could no longer be discerned.  He may have lived nonetheless.  Can we tell the difference between such cases and others where we can still discern at least some historical core?  Appollonius of Tyana, itinerant Neo-Pythagorean contemporary of Jesus (with whom the ancients often compare him) is one such.  He, too, seems entirely cut from the cloth of the fabulous.  His story, too, conforms exactly to the Mythic Hero Archetype.  To a lesser extent, so does Caesar Augustus, of whom miracles are told.  The difference is that Jesus has left no footprint on profane history as these others managed to do.  The famous texts of Josephus and Tacitus, even if genuine, amount merely to references to the preaching of contemporary Christians, not reporting about Jesus as a contemporary.  We still have documentation from people who claimed to have met Apollonius, Peregrinus, and, of course, Augustus.  It might be that Jesus was just as historical as these other remarkable individuals and that it was mere chance that no contemporary documentation referring to him survives.  But we cannot assume the truth of that for which we have no evidence.

 

A paragraph back, I referred to the central axiom of form criticism:  that nothing would have been passed down in the tradition unless it was useful to prove some point, to provide some precedent.  I am sorry to say that this axiom cancels out another, the Criterion of Dissimilarity: the closer a Jesus-saying seems to match the practice or teaching of the early Church, the greater likelihood that it stems from the latter and has been placed fictively into the speech or life of Jesus merely to secure its authority.  Put the two principles together and observe how one consumes the other without remainder; all pericopae of the Jesus tradition owe their survival to the fact that they were useful.  On the assumption that Christians saw some usefulness to them, we can posit a Sitz-im-Leben Kirche for each one.  And that means it is redundant to posit a pre-Christian Sitz-im-Leben Jesu context.  None of it need go back to Jesus.

 

Additionally, we can demonstrate that every hortatory saying is so closely paralleled in contemporary Rabbinic or Hellenistic lore that there is no particular reason to be sure this or that saying originated with Jesus.  Such words commonly passed from one famous name to another, especially in Jewish circles, as Jacob Neusner has shown.  Jesus might have said it, sure, but then he was just one more voice in the general choir.  Is that what we want to know about him?  And, as Bultmann observed, who remembers the great man quoting somebody else?

 

Another shocker: it hit me like a ton of bricks when I realized after studying much previous research on the question, that virtually every story in the gospels and Acts can be shown to be very likely a Christian rewrite of material from the Septuagint.  Homer, Euripides’ Bacchae, and Josephus.  One need not be David Hume to see that, if a story tells us a man multiplied food to feed a multitude, it is inherently much more likely that the story is a rewrite of an older miracle tale (starring Elisha) than it is a report of a real event.  A literary origin is always to be preferred to a  historical one in such a case.  And that is the choice we have to make in virtually every case of New Testament narrative.  I refer the interested reader to my essay “New Testament Narrative as Old Testament Midrash,” in Jacob Neusner and Alan J. Avery-Peck, eds. Encyclopaedia of Midrash, in this collection.  Of course I am dependent here upon many fine works by Randel Helms, Thomas L. Brodie, John Dominic Crossan, and others.  None of them went as far as I am going.  It is just that as I counted up the gospel stories I felt each scholar had convincingly traced back to a previous literary prototype, it dawned on me that there was virtually nothing left.  None tried to argue for the fictive character of the whole tradition, and each offered some cases I found arbitrary and implausible.  Still, their work, when combined, militated toward a whole fictive Jesus story.
It is not as if I believe there is no strong argument for a historical Jesus.  There is one:  one can very plausibly read certain texts in Acts, Mark, and Galatians as fossils preserving the memory of a succession struggle following the death of Jesus, who, therefore, must have existed.  Who should follow Jesus as his vicar on earth? His disciples (analogous to the Companions of the Prophet Muhammad, who provided the first three caliphs)? Or should it be the Pillars, his own relatives (the Shi’ite Muslims called Muhammad’s kinsmen the Pillars, too, and supported their dynastic claims)? One can trace the same struggles in the Baha’i Faith after the death of the Bab (Mirza Ali Muhammad): who should rule, his brother Subh-i-Azal or his disciple Hussein Ali, Baha’Ullah?  Who should follow the Prophet Joseph Smith?  His disciples, or his son, Joseph, Jr.?  When the Honorable Elijah Muhammad died, Black Muslims split and followed either his son and heir Wareeth Deen Muhammad or his former lieutenant Louis Farrakhan.  In the New Testament, as Harnack and Stauffer argued, we seem to see the remains of a Caliphate of James.  And that implies (though it does not prove) a historical Jesus.

 

And it implies a historical Jesus of a particular type.  It implies a Jesus who was a latter-day Judah Maccabee, with a group of brothers who could take up the banner when their eldest brother, killed in battle, perforce let it fall.  S.G.F. Brandon made a very compelling case for the original revolutionary character of Jesus, subsequently sanitized and made politically harmless by Mark the evangelist.  Judging by the skirt-clutching outrage of subsequent scholars, Mark’s apologetic efforts to depoliticize the Jesus story have their own successors.  Brandon’s work is a genuine piece of the classic Higher Criticism of the gospels, with the same depth of reason and argumentation.  If there was a historical Jesus, my vote is for Brandon’s version.

 

But I must point out that there is another way to read the evidence for the Zealot Jesus hypothesis.  As Burton Mack has suggested, the political element in the Passion seems likely to represent an anachronistic confusion by Mark with the events leading to the fall of Jerusalem.  When the Olivet Discourse warns its readers not to take any of a number of false messiahs and Zealot agitators for their own Jesus, does this not imply Christians were receiving the news of Theudas or Jesus ben Ananias or John of Gischala as news of Jesus return?  You don’t tell people not to do what they’re already not doing.  If they were making such confusions, it would be inevitable that the events attached to them would find their way back into the telling of the Jesus story.  It looks like this very thing happened.  One notices how closely the interrogation and flogging of Jesus ben-Ananias, in trouble for predicting the destruction of the temple, parallels that of Jesus, ostensibly 40 years previously.  We notice how Simon bar Gioras was welcomed into the temple with palm branches to cleanse the sacred precinct from the “thieves” who infested it.  Zealots under John of Gischala.  Uh-oh.  Suppose these signs of historical-political verisimilitude are interlopers in the gospels from the following generation.  The evidence for the Zealot Jesus evaporates.

 

I have not tried to amass every argument I could think of to destroy the historicity of Jesus.  Rather, I have summarized the series of realizations about methodology and evidence that eventually led me to embrace the Christ Myth Theory.  There may once have been a historical Jesus, but for us, there is one no longer.  If he existed, he is forever lost behind the stained glass curtain of holy myth.  At least that’s the current state of the evidence as I see it.

 

The present volume contains the major essays and papers I have written to set forth the case for the Christ myth theory, as well as my best attempts to deal with the major difficulties scholars, have pointed out with it.  There will be some overlap, but I think that is helpful, as certain of these points can use reiteration and can benefit from a presentation from slightly different angles.  I would like to thank the editors and publishers whose permissions to reprint this material made this book possible.

IN HIS NAME: YHWH True Name of our Creator – 4

God’s name the “I Am”, reveals the fullness of His nature, all of God’s nature and attributes are embodied in His name.

God’s name, as written in Hebrew right to left: 

Originally Hebrew didn’t have any vowels, and was written right to left, although some of the consonants carry with them the indication of associated vowel sounds.For instance, the “Y” is associated with the sound of a “long e”,  as in “team”.  The H is associated with the sound of a “short a” as “ah!”  The Vav is associated with the vowel “u” and produces the sound in the word “cool.” Thus, the name of the Creator sounds something like “ee-ah oo’ ah”, with the accent on the second of the three syllables, as is the pronunciation convention in Hebrew.

A brief study in linguistics.

To translate is to explain the meaning of one language using the words of another.

To transliterate is to spell a word using the letters of another language.

I am” is the English translation of the meaning of God’s personal name.

The English transliteration of God’s personal name is YHWH, with vowels added, YAHWEH, translated to I AM WHO I AM.

The four Hebrew letters transliterated YHWH are:

YHWH 1 a Yod, rhymes with “rode”, which we transliterate “Y”

YHWH 2 a He, rhymes with “say”, which we transliterate “H”

YHWH 3 a Vav, like “lava”, which we transliterate “W” or “V”

YHWH 4 another He

No matter what language you use, whether you translate or transliterate, YHWH’s name means “I am that I am” and it directly points to His real name, which is the same in all languages.

The research above was graciously provided by YHWH.com

What’s good and bad about religion?

[First posted in 2012.   Sinaites are not ‘down’ on religion as some of our critics mistakenly think; this post explains our position:  we are not a religion;  we are a way of thinking which leads to a way of life based on what we have accepted as YHWH’s guidelines for living for all humanity, not just for Israel, and that is the TORAH life.  This adds to the many articles we have written about our perspective.—Admin1]

 

Image from www.comparativereligion.com

Image from www.comparativereligion.com

 

Sinaites define “religion” as a man-initiated attempt to relate to an unknown supernatural power.   Religion is human-sourced, based on man’s philosophical musings, speculations, logic, conclusions leading to beliefs and convictions about a supernatural entity whom man wants to know but cannot see or prove, but feel a spiritual link with.

 

This man-initiated attempt might begin with—

  • simply recognizing that there is a higher power,  
  • then move on to seeking to know him,  
  • and further to defining and naming him;   
  • and determining ways to please, placate, worship him;   
  • and finally to living according to how man thinks this god requires him to live.  

All beliefs in a deity might loosely fall under “religion.”  In this sense, religion is good, because at least there is an acknowledgment of God’s existence followed by accountability to God.  It should make a difference in how a believer in a god lives his life on earth, how he uses his time, opportunities, giftings, etc. 

 

[AST] Proverbs 9:10-11  

“The beginning of wisdom is fear of  HASHEM [YHWH]

and [the beginning of] understanding is knowledge of the sacred.  

For through me your days will be increased,

and they will increase years of life for you.

 If you have become wise,

you have become wise for your own good,

and if you have scoffed,

you alone will bear [responsibility].”

 

Some people end their speculation with an awareness of God and go no further.  Others progress to the next step—how do I get to know this Being, this Entity?  

 

Image from Pinterest

Image from Pinterest

The normal route resorted to is—they turn to existing religious sects, small groupings or communities, persuaded that the leaders know more than they do about “the way” to God. There are many institutionalized religions that have world-wide reach and influence, one doesn’t have to stick his neck out to join any of them; they’re out to go after any seeker. 

 

The goal of a God-seeker is simply to know God if that is at all possible.  It starts as a personal quest but as one starts relating to others with the same objective, they start connecting with other seekers. Before you know it, they form fellowships, religious communities, then institutionalize into churches.  Each tends to have an exclusive claim to truth and to being in the right religion as the only way to God. 

 

Image from www.ghanacelebrities.com

Image from www.ghanacelebrities.com

History has a sad record of the evils of religion, so that’s the BAD part of religion. It tends to promote self-righteousness, intolerance, exclusivism, bias towards others of different faiths, tunnel vision, persecution, fanaticism, to name a few.

 

The Crusades and the Inquisition all but eliminated any opposition or challenge to the beliefs espoused by Catholicism.  Cultic leaders are able to influence their flock to practice polygamy, isolate themselves in communities to wait for the end of the world and worse, cultic leaders like Jim Jones was able to delude his flock towards mass suicide. Religious fanatics go so far as burning themselves in public for a cause and in the case of terrorists, suicide bombers are able to cause as much death and destruction to others.  

 

If there is a sure turnoff for the agnostics and atheists of the world, that would be religion and all the bad it does, ironically and unfortunately,  “in the Name of God.”

 

So where does a sincere God-seeker/Truth-seeker turn to, if not religion?  

 

There IS another way:  try the original revelation of God . . . that would be the Sinai revelation recorded in the five books attributed to Moses—the Torah.   Get to know the  God Who revealed Himself, His Name, and His will for all humanity.

 

The goal is relationship with the One True God, not religion. With this relationship is a bonus, a way of life, Torah, “instructions” on how to live in community, whether Jew or Gentile.   Pore through the Scriptures, both the “Old” and the “New” and look for any commandment that says “join a religion”, or even “join MY religion” . . . you will not find it.  What you will find is “obey my commandments”.  

 

And now, Israel 

[Mixed Multitude, Gentiles among you]

what does YHVH your God require of you,

but to fear YHVH your God,

to walk in all His WAYS,

and to love Him,

to serve YHVH your God with all your heart and with all your soul,

and to keep the commandments of YHVH and His statutes

which I command you today

for your good? 

(Deuteronomy 19:12-13)

For YHVH your God

is the God of gods

and the Lord of lords,

the great, the mighty,

and the awesome God!

(Deuteronomy 10:17)

NSB@S6K
  logo

Sig-4_16colors

 

Leviticus/Wayyiqrah 11 – As a Torah-observant Jew, what would Jesus have eaten?

[First posted November 28, 2012, the year we started this website. The Leviticus 11 “divinely prescribed diet” is still relevant in this day and age, year 2019 even if Christianity misunderstood what its man-god supposedly declared, that “all foods are clean.”  Read on.–Admin1].

———————–

Would the Author of TORAH leave out an area of human life that would not only enhance the quality of life but also extend the quantity of life?  YHWH is the Source of Life, would He not include instructions about how to best sustain life, specially human life?

 

Let thy food be thy medicine

and thy medicine thy food.”

– Hippocrates.

 

Modern medicine today sees the value of the vegan diet (listen to and look at the lean and healthier US ex-president Bill Clinton who has turned advocate); or going ovo-vegetarian or lacto-vegetarian; or avoiding certain meats and guess which ones they are.

 

The Seventh Day Adventists have successful lifestyle change programs that claim to reverse chronic and and life-threatening diseases and a major component of the change is a vegan diet.

 

We are just beginning to wake up to health alerts relating to food choices, yet the newly freed slaves had the luxury of being taught by the Creator of the human body Himself some 4 millennia ago!

 

Instructions on what is the best and healthiest food for humans is what this chapter is about.  If the Creator Himself who knows why He designed different creatures for different purposes gives instructions to humankind about what to eat and not eat, explaining what makes animals clean or unclean, should we not simply obey?

 

Just think:  Why would the flesh of swine, for instance, be forbidden as “food” during the time of the wilderness wanderings and then be allowed just because Jesus supposedly declared “all foods clean”?  Was there a change in the constitution of swine flesh and other unclean foods (oyster, crab, lobster, shrimp)  or are they not exactly the same today as they were in those days?

 

 Christians misinterpret the verse in Mark 7:19, by conveniently forgetting that Jesus the Jew would have been Torah-observant and as such, when he said “food” his frame of reference would have been the Leviticus 11 definition of food.

 

People who are used to eating unclean meat, whether out of ignorance or misinterpretation of the Jesus text have difficulty adjusting their tastebuds and their appetites to such drastic restriction in their food choices; they would rather face the inevitable health risks that later develop which are the natural consequences of disobeying Torah on food.

 

Consequences of violating Torah are automatic, God does not have to step in and teach each pork-eater a lesson, for eventually the forbidden meat starts causing problem-diseases that naturally take their toll.

 

Medical practitioners suggest changes in lifestyle, change in diet, specific avoidance of . . . guess what?

 

A Christian friend got offended when told that it was up to her or anyone for that matter, if after being biblically informed, to continue eating animals which are scavengers, which the Creator had intended to clean up the garbage on earth and under the sea. She cited the same verses in the gospels and Acts to justify today’s free-for-all food choices.  Consequence to disobedience may be the best and most effective teacher; we should quit mouthing scripture and just watch, wait, and see.  Modern medicine validates what Leviticus 11 has prescribed for human consumption; after all, who better than the Creator/Designer of the human body is the ultimate authority to pronounce what is “food” and not “food”?

 

Again, simple common sense tells us—animals were the same on day 1 of their creation till today, unless man has the ability to alter their constitution, or the scavengers  have metamorphosed from unclean to clean by the simple declaration of Jesus Christ.  Could that truly be so?

 

This is not an attack on the Creator’s amazing animals called “scavengers” who do their divinely-designated assignment to rid the earth of rotting flesh; these animals have built-in protection and will not get sick nor die from cleaning up the earth’s filth . . . but humans who eat these animals are not similarly protected.

 

But then again, taking risks is a human choice, believing or disbelieving TORAH is a faith choice, ultimately it boils down to a health choice because there are health consequences even if you have “faith” in the declaration of Jesus Christ, or the usual interpretation of your pastor. Go back to the question in our title and figure it out for yourself.

 

Postscript:  We have already posted a whole series of articles on the Leviticus Diet; please read if you have not yet done so.

 

   NSB@S6K

AIbEiAIAAABDCNPkvrXuucmdeSILdmNhcmRfcGhvdG8qKGJkZTc0YTk3NmUxMGM4OTAzZjk5MDhkMjdkZDI2ODQ3OTliYmQ2MDkwAe5UdNp0lvYvCf8bjAFEJOY_fdsj

 

 

 

 

 

———————

 

[We have yet to fill in the commentary and hopefully we can accomplish that in this year of 2017!  Not a promise, just an intention. But even without commentary, the text is easy to understand on its own.  After all, when YHWH gave these instructions through His mouthpiece, Moses, the hearers most likely did not have to resort to commentaries to understand what is clean and unclean meat. 

 

Translation:  EF/Everett Fox, The Five Books of Moses; commentary from  AST/ArtScroll Tanach and P&H/Pentateuch and Haftorahs, ed. Dr. J.H. Hertz.  Highlights and reformatting ours.–Admin1.]

 

 

Leviticus/Wayyiqrah 11

1 YHVH spoke to Moshe and to Aharon, saying to them:
2 Speak to the Children of Israel, saying to them: 
These are the living-creatures that you may eat, from all the domestic-animals that are upon the earth:
3 any one having a hoof, cleaving a cleft in (its) hooves, 
bringing-up the cud, among the animals-
that-one you may eat.
4 However, these you are not to eat
from those bringing-up the cud, or from those having a hoof: 
the camel, for it brings-up the cud, but a hoof it does not have,
it is tamei for you;
5 the hyrax, for it brings-up the cud, but a hoof it does not have, 
it is tamei for you;
6 the hare, for it brings-up the cud, but a hoof it does not have, 
it is tamei for you;
7 the pig, for it has a hoof and cleaves a cleft in the hoof, but (as for) it-the cud it does not chew up, 
it is tamei for you.
8 From their flesh you are not to eat, their carcasses you are not to touch, 
they are tamei for you!
9 These you may eat from all that are in the water: 
any one that has fins and scales in the water, (whether) in the seas or in the streams, 
them you may eat.
10 But any one that does not have fins and scales, 
(whether) in the seas or in the streams, 
from all swarming-things in the water, from all living beings that are in the water- 
they are detestable-things for you!
11 And they shall remain detestable-things for you:
from their flesh you are not to eat, their (very) carcasses you are to detest.
12 Any one that does not have fins and scales in the water- 
it is a detestable-thing for you!
13 Now these you are to hold-detestable from fowl
-they are not to be eaten, they are detestable-things: 
the eagle, the bearded-vulture and the black-vulture,
14 the kite and the falcon according to its kind,
15 every raven according to its kind;
16 the desert owl, the screech owl and the sea gull, 
and the hawk according to its kind;
17 the little-owl, the cormorant, and the great owl;
18 the barn-owl, the pelican, and the Egyptian-vulture;
19 the stork, the heron according to its kind, 
the hoopoe and the bat.
20 Any flying swarming-creature that goes about on all fours- 
it is a detestable-thing for you!
21 However, these you may eat from any flying swarming-creature that goes about on all fours: (those) that have jointed-legs above their feet, with which to leap on the earth;
22 as for these, from them you may eat:
the locust according to its kind, the bald-locust according to its kind;
the cricket according to its kind, the grasshopper according to its kind.
23 But every (other) flying swarming-creature that has four legs, 
it is a detestable-thing for you!
24 Now from these you can become tamei
-whoever touches their carcass shall be tamei until sunset,
25 whoever carries (any part) of their carcass is to scrub his garments, and remain-tamei until sunset:
26 every animal that divides a divided-hoof, but cleaving does not cleave it through, and its cud does not bring up;
they are tamei for you, 
whoever touches them is tamei!
27 And any one that goes about on its paws, among all animals that go about on all fours, 
they are tamei for you, 
whoever touches their carcass is tamei until sunset;
28 one who carries their carcass is to scrub one’s garments and be tamei until sunset, 
they are tamei for you.
29 Now these are for you (the) ones tamei 
among the swarming-creatures that swarm on the earth: 
the weasel, the mouse, and the great-lizard according to its kind;
30 the gecko, the monitor and the lizard,
the sand-lizard and the chameleon.
31 These are (the) ones tamei for you among all the swarming-creatures; 
whoever touches them when they are dead shall be tamei until sunset,
32 anything upon which one of them should fall when they are dead shall be tamei, 
whether any vessel of wood or cloth or skin or sackcloth 
-any vessel that can be used in work- 
it is to be put through water;
it remains-tamei until sunset, 
then it is pure.
33 And (regarding) any earthen vessel into which one of them falls, within it, 
everything within it shall be tamei, 
and it-you are to break (it)!
34 As for any food that might be eaten,
should water come in (contact with) it, it shall be tamei; 
and any beverage that might be drunk, 
(if) in any vessel, it shall be tamei.
35 Anything (else) on which their carcass falls shall be tamei; 
an oven or a two-pot-stove is to be demolished- 
they are tamei,
they shall remain tamei for you.
36 However, a spring or a cistern (for) gathering water shall remain pure, 
but one who touches their carcass shall be tamei.
37 Now if (part) of their carcass falls upon any sowing seed that is to be sown,
it remains-pure.
38 But if water is put on the seed and (part) of their carcass falls on it, 
it is tamei for you.
39 If there should die one of the animals that are (permitted) to you for eating, 
one who touches its carcass shall remain-tamei until sunset.
40 One who eats from its carcass is to scrub his garments, remaining-tamei until sunset, 
one who carries its carcass is to scrub his garments, remaining-tamei until sunset.
41 Any swarming-creature that swarms upon the earth: 
it is a detestable-thing, it is not to be eaten.
42 Anything going about on its belly, anything going about on all fours, up to anything with many legs, among all swarming-creatures that swarm upon the earth: 
you are not to eat them, 
for they are detestable-things!
43 Do not make yourselves detestable through any swarming-thing that swarms; 
you are not to make yourselves tamei through them, becoming tamei through them!
44 For I YHVH am your God: 
you are to hallow yourselves and be holy,
for holy am I; 
you are not to make yourselves tamei through any swarming-creature that crawls about upon the earth.
45 For I am YHVH, the one bringing you up from the land of Egypt, to be God to you; 
you are to be holy, for holy am I!
46 This is the Instruction for animals, fowl and all living beings that stir in the water, all beings that swarm upon the earth,
47 that there may be-separation between the tamei and the pure, 
between the living-creatures that may be eaten and the living-creatures that you are not to eat.