The “I” in “Image” vs. the “I” in “Idolatry”

Image from lylemook.com

Image from lylemook.com

[First posted in 2014. This article makes us rethink our understanding of the word ‘idolatry’.  In antiquity, it was simply the sin of worshipping another, whether a god of one’s imagination or anything that takes the place of the True God. What did they know, they were ignorant until the True God started revealing Himself.  Were they excused?  Wouldn’t you be if there was no way to know the One True God since He had not yet revealed Himself except perhaps in His created world? And even so, one would simply be guessing.

 

Think another way:  from biblical times on to our day, worship may not even be the issue at all.  

  • What or who takes pre-eminence in my life?
  • Who makes the decision —
    • to worship whom or what,
    • or not to worship at all,
    • particularly in this day and age of the worldwideweb
    • when there is no more reason and no excuse to be ignorant of any subject
    • except by choice?

 

The title gives the clue.—Admin1].

 

———————-

 

Forget the New Testament teaching that every person born in this world is tainted with “original sin” inherited from the first couple in Eden; hence everyone is helpless and cannot save himself, that’s why he needs the Christian Savior. That faulty teaching removes personal responsibility and personal choice from man, making him hopeless in utter depravity and incapable of making right choices. It ignores the truth that man, being the only created being endowed with free will, is made in the image of God—the “I” in Image that endows him with the ability to make Godlike choices despite  the disobedience of the first couple for which only the first couple is accountable, not their progeny.

 

We’ve written articles about this subject so if you’re so inclined please check out the following posts:

 

 

Pay close attention to what is taught in  the Hebrew Scriptures (renamed Old Testament which is supposedly the foundation of the New Testament).  The Tanakh/Tanach teaches that man is born with two inclinations:

  • one that leans toward choosing to do Right,
  • another that leans toward choosing the opposite of Right.

To quote from our post:

 

In every individual there is that balance of the evil inclination, yetzer hara as the Jewish interpreters term it, with the good inclination.  It is all and always a matter of individual choice.

 Contrary to Christian teaching, we are not born condemned to nonexistent hell because we inherited original sin from Adam and Eve; each individual is  free to choose between the two inclinations within him/her-self that he/she constantly faces and struggles with. The potential to do good, to do what is right, balances the potential to do just the opposite. 

The “I, me and myself” tends to predominate unless it has been conditioned and disciplined or coerced to submit to another. 

As long as that power to choose has not been stripped from us by another authority, we are each individually responsible for each and every choice that we make.

 

 

What or who determines what is right? Who else but the God of Righteousness who is also the Revelator on Sinai, the God of Israel, the God of the Hebrew Scriptures.

 

“We are fully endowed to be able to know the truth. All we must do is make the effort,” is a timely reminder from Rabbi Abraham J. Twerski.

 

[EF] Deuteronomy/Davarim 30

15 See, I set before you today 
life and good, and death and ill:
16 in that I command you today 
to love YHVH your God, 
to walk in his ways and to keep his commandments, his laws and his regulations, that you may stay-alive and become-many 
and YHVH your God may bless you
 in the land that you are entering to possess.
17 Now if your heart should face-about, and you do not hearken, 
and you thrust-yourself-away and prostrate yourselves to other gods, and serve them,
18 I announce to you today 
that perish, you will perish, 
you will not prolong days on the soil that you are crossing the Jordan to enter, to possess.
19 I call-as-witness against you today the heavens and the earth: 
life and death I place before you, blessing and curse; 
now choose life, in order that you may stay-alive, you and your seed,
20 by loving YHVH your God, 
by hearkening to his voice and by cleaving to him, 
for he is your life and the length of your days, 
to be settled on the soil
 that YHVH swore to your fathers, to Avraham, to Yitzhak and to Yaakov, 
to give them!

 

Micah 6:8

It hath been told thee, O man, what is good,

and what YHWH doth require of thee:

only to do justly,

and to love mercy,

and to walk humbly with thy God.

 

Free will is a gift from God, given only to humankind.  The angelic spirits were not endowed with freedom of choice, surprised?  (So no possibility of fallen angels; don’t ever say “the devil made me do it.”).   How privileged indeed is man to be made in the ‘image” of God, the only Being who exercises free will, that is,  until He decided to gift it to humankind.

 

Question:  is there anything the Almighty God cannot do?  

Answer: Yes, only that which He restrains HIMself from doing . . . and one would be— never to interfere with nor violate man’s free will.  He could surround man with external influences to help man make the right choice;  He could also allow man to be tempted to test him as He did with the first couple but ultimately that choice is still for man to make.

 

So the “I” in Image chooses to do right.

 

———————

 

Rabbi Abraham J. Twerski elaborates (Growing Each DayAish.com):

 

He created him [Adam] in the image of God (Genesis 1:27).

 

Since God is not corporeal, the term “image of God” obviously refers to humanity’s capacity for Godliness, i.e. to share in the Divine attributes of rational thinking, spirituality, sanctity, creativity – attributes that distinguish us from all other living things. . .

 

The serpent seduced Adam and Eve to eat of the forbidden Tree of Knowledge by convincing them that doing so would enable them to become God-like (ibid. 3:5). Why did they succumb to this argument, since they already knew that they were created betzelem Elokim, with the capacity to be God-like?

 

That unique endowment did not disappear from the so-called “fall”, it is still in every human being born since the first man/woman; neither is it overpowered except when man chooses to give in to the other inclination that provides the balance, since to exercise freedom of the will there should be two equal competing influences within as well as without.

 

————————-

 

If the “I” in the “Image” tends toward Godliness, to doing what is right; the “I” in idolatry, leans toward doing just the opposite.

In essence, idolatry is the choice to follow another “god” that is not the One True God, YHWH.

 

Ponder this:

  •  Who makes the choice to follow someone or something other than God?  “I”, me, myself.
  • So when “I’ make the choice, “I” am guilty of idolatry.
  •  How so?  “I” follow my inclination to disobey God, therefore “I” make myself some kind of a god, one that competes with God.
  • In effect, when “I” decide to drop the True God and replace Him with an idol,

—-“I” am not really worshipping that idol,

—-“I” have dared to defy God and by doing so,

—-“I” have made myself the competing idol with God.

 

Rabbi Matthew Berkowitz in A Taste of Torah considers “habitual sinful behavior” as “idolatry of another sort” and he is right.  

  • When “I” indulge in habitual sinful behavior,
  • any sin that “I” keep doing over and over,
  • who is the “I” serving?  
  • I, me and myself, nobody else.
  • “I” serve my interest first and foremost, over and above anyone else,
  • over and above God Himself!

 

Who is God competing with in my life?

 “I”, me!

 

“I” have become my idol.

 NSB@S6K

 

 logo

 

Is God the author of “evil”?

Image from www.hippoquotes.com

Image from www.hippoquotes.com

[First posted in 2012.  What prompted this repost is the series of mass killings, all occurring in the “land of the free”,  the great USA.   After the mass murder during a concert in Las Vegas, and the vehicle rampage in New York, the latest tragedy  has just occurred in a First Baptist church in a small town in  Texas.  Where in this ‘world-gone-mad’  is it safe to enjoy music, walk in a park, or worship in church? The question that’s in believers’ minds is usually:  Where is God in all this? Why is He so quiet, not preventing, not interfering? And since the latest act of violence was against worshippers of God in the ‘house’ of worship, why did God not intervene to protect worshippers of Him?

 

Let us not forget that all the evil is perpetrated by who else?   The only creature–

  • endowed with brains for reasoning and logic, 
  • made in the “image” of the Creator,
  • with free will to go against the laws for human relationships written in heart and conscience of the “I” in the “Image”;
  • who follows instead,  the “I-Me-Myself,” or simply the “I” in the “Idol”. 

 

Here’s the original introduction in 2012:

 

When we look at the current state of affairs everywhere in the world today, we start wondering if God is “in control” as we often hear from the mouths of die-hard religionists.  Nothing wrong with that, except we forget that the Giver of the gift of free will to humankind does not interfere with each individual’s use of that precious gift.  What He has done is to give instructions and commandments that would direct the only creature made in “His Image” to properly use His gift of free will, to make responsible choices, those aligned with His will, those that benefit fellowmen and this world the most, for that is what the TORAH teaches.

 

So where does evil come from?  For individuals to ‘make a choice’ there has to be not one, but at least two options to exercise that choice.  To be human is to be self-conscious and actually self-centered first (observe children); we have to be taught to be other-centered.

 

Ultimately, the answer is the misuse of this God-given gift.  Blame the Creator for giving humanity this gift?  No, instead, look in the mirror.  Enough people misusing the gift creates human-caused evil.  As for natural calamities, well, that is part of the natural workings in this created world.  Preventable? Sometimes. —Admin1.)

 

—————————————

 

 

If there is no evil being as a devil, and there are no demonic spirits wreaking havoc in our lives, then where is the evil coming from that we see in the world?

 

If it is caused by people, then we lay the blame there.  If it is caused by natural forces, since we cannot control nature, we live with precaution and safety-consciousness in a world of earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, landslides and other natural calamities; after all, these are simply part of nature adjusting itself to maintain the balance the Creator set from the beginning of His designed order.  Everything else that does not fall under manmade causes and natural causes could ultimately be called, to borrow a phrase from insurance contracts, “an act of God.”

 

Many writers have seriously explored the problem of evil in the world and have arrived at different conclusions, depending on their system of belief.  Prime examples:

 

419gm2pappl-_ac_us240_ql65_Rabbi Harold Kushner’s When Bad Things Happen to Good People presents Reconstructionist Judaism’s point of view that horrible things do happen on a daily basis in this world, but gives a perspective that you would simply have to read in his book.

 

417ldjme7dl-_ac_us240_ql65_Atheist-turned-Christian C.S. Lewis struggled with the tension between belief and reality and a God who can allow so much suffering in his book The Problem of Pain; nevertheless, he never lost his faith in the Christian God.

 

51m6xalwgql-_sx329_bo1204203200_ In contrast, Bart Ehrman, NT scholar turned atheist because, as he explains in his book God’s Problem, the Bible fails to answer our most important question—why we suffer.

 

The worst thing you can tell relatives of a good person who was tortured and brutally murdered by strangers is— “it’s God’s will.”  That would make anyone turn against God, because why should God–the source of all good–will evil in the lives of good people?

 

So what’s the answer?  Where’s the answer? If one believes in God, turn to the Good Book and see what God Himself says.There are no simple answers but there is a verse that invites further exploration:  

 

[NIV]:  7 I form the light and create darkness, 
   I bring prosperity and create disaster; 
[KJV]     I, the LORD, do all these things. 7I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.

 

 

[ESV] I form light and create darkness, I make well-being and create calamity, I am the LORD, who does all these things.

 

 

Isaiah 45:7 [I am the One] Who forms light and creates darkness; Who makes peace and creates evil; I am HaShem, Maker of all these. — [ArtScroll Tanach/AST]

 

 

Please read the whole chapter of Isaiah 45 to get the context; better yet, start reading the whole book of Isaiah to truly understand what chapter 45 is all about. As we keep reiterating, verses isolated from context, Context, CONTEXT are easily misinterpreted.

 

 

One attempt to explain this particular verse went to such lengths to find out how many times the original Hebrew word for evil– “rah” —was used in the Hebrew Bible, counting the times “rah” meant “evil” and the times it meant “calamity, adversity, affliction, trouble” etc.  In this particular context of Isaiah 45, “evil” is used for trouble, calamity, and not moral evil which God by His nature, is never capable of causing.  (If you’re thinking of the book of Job, that’s another story;  please read the posts:

 

 

 

An even better explanation connects the verse to the religious historical context:  the Persian king Cyrus is used by YHWH as His anointed, His messiah, His instrument to enable the Israelites in exile to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the Temple. The prevalent belief among the Persians and followers of the Magian religion is dualism –that there are two supreme, independent, co-existing and eternal causes always acting in opposition to each other:  the author of good and the author of evil.  Adonai Elohim YHWH unequivocally states that He alone is the sovereign God, there is no other power that exists in opposition to Him; in that sense, everything occurs under His providential direction, whether good or evil.

Add to Isaiah the following verse from Amos:

 

Amos 3:6 – “Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done it?”

 

Just as darkness is the absence of light, evil is the absence of good.

 

 

When God withdraws from this world or conceals Himself, goodness, righteousness, justice and many more are at risk. God is the source of Light in all its metaphorical implications [spiritual understanding, biblical comprehension, enlightenment, wisdom]. God is the source of all that is associated with good — kindness, charity, mercy, justice, love, order etc.  Notice that those words reflect what is given in Commandments 5-10, all directed to levels of human relationship.

 

When people are ignorant of or are willfully violating God’s Torah, evil indeed triumphs.  In that sense and only in that indirect sense is God the author of evil.

 
Sig-4_16colors

AIbEiAIAAABDCNPkvrXuucmdeSILdmNhcmRfcGhvdG8qKGJkZTc0YTk3NmUxMGM4OTAzZjk5MDhkMjdkZDI2ODQ3OTliYmQ2MDkwAe5UdNp0lvYvCf8bjAFEJOY_fdsj

Revisit: Shedding without blood . . .

[First posted in 2012; a thought-provoking article challenging the traditional Christian interpretation and justification for the shedding of blood to receive God’s forgiveness of sin.  How far has this major world religion diverged from the plain meaning of an “Old Testament” text? How has Christianity used as “prooftext” the OT prequel to its NT sequel? This is one of numerous misused and misinterpreted handpicked texts taken out of context.  So this is just one of our many efforts to correct misreading and interpreting out of context that is so prevalent among those who consciously or unconsciously force OT prequel to conform to NT sequel instead of the other way around which is the natural and logical way to read any book that has two parts.  —Admin1.]

 

—————————-

 
Image from www.nccg.org

Image from www.nccg.org

One of the unexpected, intriguing, thought-provoking answers we’ve ever received in Ask the Rabbi is from Rabbi M. Younger [aish.com] about Genesis 3:7, 21.

 

[AST] 7  Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked.  And they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths.

 

  [ESV] 7 Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked. And they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths.

 
[EF] 7. The eyes of the two of them were opened
and they knew then
that they were nude.  
They sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths.

 

 [AST]  21  And HASHEM God made for Adam and his wife garments of skin and He clothed them.

 

[ESV]  And the Lord God made for Adam and for his wife garments of skins and clothed them.

 

[EF] 21  Now YHWH, God, made Adam and his wife coats of skins and clothed them.

 

On first reading:

 

 

Adam and Eve choose to cover themselves with fig leaves but the Creator changes that covering with “garments of skin” or “clothing from animal skins”.

 

Left unstated is something commonly  presumed:   to get animal skin, one has to slaughter an animal, take a life, shed blood.

 

Just think: Adam and Eve, being the first couple, probably had some difficulty understanding the warning “For the day you eat of it, you shall surely die.”  Presumably, they have never witnessed death nor caused the death of other living creatures. They have never killed an animal for food because they were vegetarian/vegan; nor for clothing since they had never felt ashamed that they were naked . . .  until they disobeyed.

 

Following this  trend of thought, it would appear that the first who takes an animal’s life is the Creator of Life Himself! The seriousness of the first couple’s disobedience seems to have dire consequences on animals who will then become the sacrificial substitutes for disobedient humanity.

 

At least that is also implied in the answer of one rabbi to the question:  why was the serpent cursed if it was simply a symbol of man’s sinful inclination?   The created world suffered and continues to suffer from humanity’s continuing violation of God’s revealed will. It is another provocative thought.

 

Back to “animal skin.”  Have we thought of reading that verse any other way?  We read “animal skin” and jump to only one conclusion, why?  Because we are oriented to progressive revelation’s ‘fast-forward’ and relating it to the God-Son Jesus,  shedding his blood to satisfy the God-Father’s divine justice.

 

Not the Jewish rabbis!   Let us not miss the fact that Torah has been entrusted to them:

  • they read Hebrew,
  • they think Jewish,
  • so they read and interpret their own Scriptures
  • in a totally different way
  • and connect the symbolism consistently
  • with the wisdom, justice, nature and attributes of the God of Israel
  • and what their Torah has taught about
  • how to deal with sin
  • and reconcile with their God.
 

There is one animal:

  • the first one identified in Scripture,
  • and used to symbolize animal instinct in man that needs to be tamed and controlled;
  • the one that represents man’s inner conscious or unconscious desire to go against divine prohibition;
  • the very same animal which, like many other species that moult, is able to shed its skin without shedding blood to rejuvenate itself.
 

Image from blog.growingwithscience.com

 

Rabbi Younger’s answer to “animal skin” is exactly that:  snake skin.

 

But why a snake?    Why not?

 

Used as a symbol —

  • the serpent of desire within us
  • is the alternative choice to the other inclination to obey God’s will —
  • we could ‘shed’ that evil inclination
  • and renew ourselves everytime we face temptation,
  • a challenge for us to obey God’s will
  • or give in to our will.

It fits in the scheme of God’s teaching in Torah that sin and its judgment is not God’s last word to man. There are second and more chances to rise from falling, from failure, from missing the mark.  Sin itself could be turned into a springboard for one’s return to God, but not without repentance, confession, and renewal.

 

When Genesis progresses to the story of Cain and Abel, God’s preference for Abel’s offering seems to bolster the Christian interpretation but please check out the wording in that story; the word used in the Hebrew translations is “offering” and not “sacrifice.” The point being made in that story is not so much the offering as it is the attitude of each brother, but that’s another article altogether.

 

As for the animal sacrifices in the Tabernacle/Temple, the Rabbi includes that in his answer, please continue reading below.

 
 
Sig-4_16colors

 

 

 

 

 

 

————————————

 

 

Image from Jewishpress.com

Image from Jewishpress.com

 

Reprinted hereunder is the A to the Q on this topic.

 

Answer:

 

Shalom – Thank you for your note. Our sages teach that it was not just any animal skin. Rather, it was snake skin!

 

 

This teaches that even when we sin, it itself can be a springboard for a rectification and even a new path with which to grow.

 

Regarding forgiveness there are four requirements when seeking atonement:

  • Regret. Realizing the extent of the damage and feeling sincere regret.
  • Cessation. Immediately stopping the harmful action.
  • Confession. Articulating the mistake and ask for forgiveness.
  • Resolution. Making a firm commitment not to repeat it in the future.
 

I think that the following article should help give us some insight into the matter:

 

The idea of how the animal offerings worked is most often misunderstood. Many believe that sacrifice was the only way to achieve atonement. Actually, atonement always was accompanied by sincere prayer, teshuva (spiritual return), and charity. Hoshea (8:13) decries people bringing offerings without making an attempt to get closer to God. For this reason, their offerings were rejected.

 

  The animal offering aided the atonement process, as it drove home the point that really the person deserved to be slaughtered, but an animal was being used in his/her place. The offering also helped atonement in many spiritual mystical ways. But we should not mistake the animal offering for more than what it is. It was an aid to atonement. It did not cause atonement.

 

Logically, how can one think that the death of an animal could atone for their sins? If a person were to commit an atrocity, such as murder, stealing, adultery, or even less severe sin, could one possibly think that slaughtering a cow and a sheep will atone for the sin? Of course not! God is not a child who is appeased by gifts and animal slaughter. God, the true judge, provides atonement for those who sincerely desire to fix their ways. An offering must be accompanied with the will to get closer to God (prayer), a promise to observe the words of the Torah more carefully (teshuva), and concern for God’s creation (charity).

 

The verse says: “The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit” (Psalms 51:19).

 

This teaches us that a person who does teshuva is regarded as if he had ascended to Jerusalem, built the Temple, erected the Altar, and offered all the offerings upon it. (Midrash – Vayikra Rabba 7:2) When a person transgresses a mitzvah in the Torah, he destroys some of his inner holiness. He cuts himself off from the Godliness that lies at the essence of his soul. When a person does teshuva — “spiritual return” — he renews and rebuilds the inner world that he has destroyed. On one level, he is rebuilding his personal “Temple” so that God’s presence (so to speak) will return there to dwell.

 

Today, without the Temple service, one of the most powerful ways to teshuva is through the inspiration of prayer. In fact, the Talmud (Brachot 26b) says that’s why the main “Amidah” prayer is recited at the exact same time that the daily offerings were sacrificed! The text of the “Amidah” was formulated by prophets who knew how to awaken deep yearnings within the Jewish soul. Through prayer, we are to achieve a spiritual desire for a full and total connection to God.

 

The following is from the Jewish prayer book:

 

“Master of the Universe,

You commanded us to bring the Daily Offering at its appointed time; and have the Kohanim perform their service, and the Levites sing and play music at the platform, and the Israelites attend at their stations. And now, because of our sins, the Holy Temple is destroyed and the Daily Offering discontinued. We have neither a Kohen at his service, nor a Levite on his platform, nor an Israelite at his station.

 

However, you have said, ‘Let the offerings of our lips replace bulls.’ Therefore, let it be Your will, our God and the God of our ancestors, that the prayer of our lips be considered and accepted and regarded favorably before You as if we had offered the Daily Offering at its appointed time, and stood in attendance at its service.”

Also, the Jews have had an oral tradition from the time of Moses (when the sacrifices started) that God considers the study of offerings as if the offering was actually brought. This is evident from Leviticus 7:37 in which it states,This is the Law of the elevation-offerings…” (Talmud – Menachot 110a)

 

(Additional sources: “Noda Beyehuda” I, O.C. 35; “Chatam Sofer” Y.D. 236 & 318; “Kovetz Teshuvot Chatam Sofer” 59.)

 

  With blessings from the Holyland,

 

Rabbi M. Younger Aish.com

 

 

 

Image from pets.answers.com

Shedding without blood . . .

[First posted in 2012; a thought-provoking article challenging the traditional Christian interpretation and justification for the shedding of blood to receive God’s forgiveness of sin.  How far has this major world religion diverged from the plain meaning of an “Old Testament” text? How has Christianity used as “prooftext” the OT prequel to its NT sequel? This is one of numerous misused and misinterpreted handpicked texts taken out of context.  So this is just one of our many efforts to correct misreading and interpreting out of context that is so prevalent among those who consciously or unconsciously force OT prequel to conform to NT sequel instead of the other way around which is the natural and logical way to read any book that has two parts.  —Admin1.]

 

—————————-

 
Image from www.nccg.org

Image from www.nccg.org

One of the unexpected, intriguing, thought-provoking answers we’ve ever received in Ask the Rabbi is from Rabbi M. Younger [aish.com] about Genesis 3:7, 21.

 

[AST] 7  Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked.  And they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths.

 

  [ESV] 7 Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked. And they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths.

 
[EF] 7. The eyes of the two of them were opened
and they knew then
that they were nude.  
They sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths.

 

 [AST]  21  And HASHEM God made for Adam and his wife garments of skin and He clothed them.

 

[ESV]  And the Lord God made for Adam and for his wife garments of skins and clothed them.

 

[EF] 21  Now YHWH, God, made Adam and his wife coats of skins and clothed them.

 

On first reading:

 

 

Adam and Eve choose to cover themselves with fig leaves but the Creator changes that covering with “garments of skin” or “clothing from animal skins”.

 

Left unstated is something commonly  presumed:   to get animal skin, one has to slaughter an animal, take a life, shed blood.

 

Just think: Adam and Eve, being the first couple, probably had some difficulty understanding the warning “For the day you eat of it, you shall surely die.”  Presumably, they have never witnessed death nor caused the death of other living creatures. They have never killed an animal for food because they were vegetarian/vegan; nor for clothing since they had never felt ashamed that they were naked . . .  until they disobeyed.

 

Following this  trend of thought, it would appear that the first who takes an animal’s life is the Creator of Life Himself! The seriousness of the first couple’s disobedience seems to have dire consequences on animals who will then become the sacrificial substitutes for disobedient humanity.

 

At least that is also implied in the answer of one rabbi to the question:  why was the serpent cursed if it was simply a symbol of man’s sinful inclination?   The created world suffered and continues to suffer from humanity’s continuing violation of God’s revealed will. It is another provocative thought.

 

Back to “animal skin.”  Have we thought of reading that verse any other way?  We read “animal skin” and jump to only one conclusion, why?  Because we are oriented to progressive revelation’s ‘fast-forward’ and relating it to the God-Son Jesus,  shedding his blood to satisfy the God-Father’s divine justice.

 

Not the Jewish rabbis!   Let us not miss the fact that Torah has been entrusted to them:

  • they read Hebrew,
  • they think Jewish,
  • so they read and interpret their own Scriptures
  • in a totally different way
  • and connect the symbolism consistently
  • with the wisdom, justice, nature and attributes of the God of Israel
  • and what their Torah has taught about
  • how to deal with sin
  • and reconcile with their God.
 

There is one animal:

  • the first one identified in Scripture,
  • and used to symbolize animal instinct in man that needs to be tamed and controlled;
  • the one that represents man’s inner conscious or unconscious desire to go against divine prohibition;
  • the very same animal which, like many other species that moult, is able to shed its skin without shedding blood to rejuvenate itself.
 

Image from blog.growingwithscience.com

 

Rabbi Younger’s answer to “animal skin” is exactly that:  snake skin.

 

But why a snake?    Why not?

 

Used as a symbol —

  • the serpent of desire within us
  • is the alternative choice to the other inclination to obey God’s will —
  • we could ‘shed’ that evil inclination
  • and renew ourselves everytime we face temptation,
  • a challenge for us to obey God’s will
  • or give in to our will.

It fits in the scheme of God’s teaching in Torah that sin and its judgment is not God’s last word to man. There are second and more chances to rise from falling, from failure, from missing the mark.  Sin itself could be turned into a springboard for one’s return to God, but not without repentance, confession, and renewal.

 

When Genesis progresses to the story of Cain and Abel, God’s preference for Abel’s offering seems to bolster the Christian interpretation but please check out the wording in that story; the word used in the Hebrew translations is “offering” and not “sacrifice.” The point being made in that story is not so much the offering as it is the attitude of each brother, but that’s another article altogether.

 

As for the animal sacrifices in the Tabernacle/Temple, the Rabbi includes that in his answer, please continue reading below.

 
 
Sig-4_16colors

 

 

 

 

 

 

————————————

 

 

Image from Jewishpress.com

Image from Jewishpress.com

 

Reprinted hereunder is the A to the Q on this topic.

 

Answer:

 

Shalom – Thank you for your note. Our sages teach that it was not just any animal skin. Rather, it was snake skin!

 

 

This teaches that even when we sin, it itself can be a springboard for a rectification and even a new path with which to grow.

 

Regarding forgiveness there are four requirements when seeking atonement:

  • Regret. Realizing the extent of the damage and feeling sincere regret.
  • Cessation. Immediately stopping the harmful action.
  • Confession. Articulating the mistake and ask for forgiveness.
  • Resolution. Making a firm commitment not to repeat it in the future.
 

I think that the following article should help give us some insight into the matter:

 

The idea of how the animal offerings worked is most often misunderstood. Many believe that sacrifice was the only way to achieve atonement. Actually, atonement always was accompanied by sincere prayer, teshuva (spiritual return), and charity. Hoshea (8:13) decries people bringing offerings without making an attempt to get closer to God. For this reason, their offerings were rejected.

 

  The animal offering aided the atonement process, as it drove home the point that really the person deserved to be slaughtered, but an animal was being used in his/her place. The offering also helped atonement in many spiritual mystical ways. But we should not mistake the animal offering for more than what it is. It was an aid to atonement. It did not cause atonement.

 

Logically, how can one think that the death of an animal could atone for their sins? If a person were to commit an atrocity, such as murder, stealing, adultery, or even less severe sin, could one possibly think that slaughtering a cow and a sheep will atone for the sin? Of course not! God is not a child who is appeased by gifts and animal slaughter. God, the true judge, provides atonement for those who sincerely desire to fix their ways. An offering must be accompanied with the will to get closer to God (prayer), a promise to observe the words of the Torah more carefully (teshuva), and concern for God’s creation (charity).

 

The verse says: “The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit” (Psalms 51:19).

 

This teaches us that a person who does teshuva is regarded as if he had ascended to Jerusalem, built the Temple, erected the Altar, and offered all the offerings upon it. (Midrash – Vayikra Rabba 7:2) When a person transgresses a mitzvah in the Torah, he destroys some of his inner holiness. He cuts himself off from the Godliness that lies at the essence of his soul. When a person does teshuva — “spiritual return” — he renews and rebuilds the inner world that he has destroyed. On one level, he is rebuilding his personal “Temple” so that God’s presence (so to speak) will return there to dwell.

 

Today, without the Temple service, one of the most powerful ways to teshuva is through the inspiration of prayer. In fact, the Talmud (Brachot 26b) says that’s why the main “Amidah” prayer is recited at the exact same time that the daily offerings were sacrificed! The text of the “Amidah” was formulated by prophets who knew how to awaken deep yearnings within the Jewish soul. Through prayer, we are to achieve a spiritual desire for a full and total connection to God.

 

The following is from the Jewish prayer book:

 

“Master of the Universe,

You commanded us to bring the Daily Offering at its appointed time; and have the Kohanim perform their service, and the Levites sing and play music at the platform, and the Israelites attend at their stations. And now, because of our sins, the Holy Temple is destroyed and the Daily Offering discontinued. We have neither a Kohen at his service, nor a Levite on his platform, nor an Israelite at his station.

 

However, you have said, ‘Let the offerings of our lips replace bulls.’ Therefore, let it be Your will, our God and the God of our ancestors, that the prayer of our lips be considered and accepted and regarded favorably before You as if we had offered the Daily Offering at its appointed time, and stood in attendance at its service.”

Also, the Jews have had an oral tradition from the time of Moses (when the sacrifices started) that God considers the study of offerings as if the offering was actually brought. This is evident from Leviticus 7:37 in which it states,This is the Law of the elevation-offerings…” (Talmud – Menachot 110a)

 

(Additional sources: “Noda Beyehuda” I, O.C. 35; “Chatam Sofer” Y.D. 236 & 318; “Kovetz Teshuvot Chatam Sofer” 59.)

 

  With blessings from the Holyland,

 

Rabbi M. Younger Aish.com

 

 

 

Image from pets.answers.com

Sinai 6000 in 2019 – ‘Looking Back, Moving Forward’

 

Image from www.slideshare.net

Image from www.slideshare.net

[This was originally posted on the 4th anniversary of Sinai 6000 and reposted on year 6.  This is not only still relevant but also still reflective of our stand today as the core community of a belief system specifically for gentiles which we have come to identify as Sinai 6000.  The title reflects our forward movement, otherwise it would have said “Looking forward but moving backward” — no way!   For us, there is no turning back except perhaps to examine why it took us so long to realize we’ve been on the wrong path, the detour from the Way to Sinai that led us instead to Golgotha.

 

If you, readers, have been with us from the beginning or have gotten on the same road to Sinai at any point of our 8-year pilgrimage, let us celebrate together the knowledge and wisdom we have acquired since.  It has been a journey of progressive clarification and understanding rather than confusion, as long as we stayed on the Way to YHWH.  

 

Each year is a gift and a blessing from the Revelator on Sinai.  How far a distance is there left to travel?  It depends on how fast we have moved toward our goal.  Will we ever arrive?  Most likely not while on this earth, but beyond is the eternal God Who awaits all awakened souls to His Truth and His Way of Life, those who have endeavored to live according to His Manual for Living, His Torah.  

 

The reward is in the living!  Remember, blessings for obedience?  That is what He promised, and the blessing is in the life lived now.  What lies beyond, we can only trust in a benevolent God Who makes promises which He keeps!  And so, greetings to God-seekers and Truth-seekers all over the world and to our nameless-faceless frequent visitors whose ‘checking in’ we can only read on our site stats and who, we presume, have journeyed on the same path.  

 

May YHWH bless all of us with more knowledge of Him and more wisdom to live whatever time has been allotted to each of us on this earth and in the physical ‘tents’ we have inhabited for the length of time we have lived.  To LIFE indeed!

 

Now here’s revisiting our 4th-anniversary post, still relevant to the Sinaite’s experience 5 years later, year A.D. 2019 in Gregorian, 5780 in the biblical calendar.—Admin1.]

 

 

——————————

 

Image from www.ecards.co.u

Image from www.ecards.co.u

Looking back to Sinai 6000’s 4th anniversary, this is what I had written:

 

Imagine my surprise when I googled ‘birthday cake with four candles’ expecting to find nothing . . . only to discover a glut of images for practically any number of candles that could fit in a cake, take your pick!  Here’s my pick: I’m the red candle, the first one to get ‘lit’ and ‘fired up’ (or so I mistakenly thought) unaware that others were simultaneously being ‘lit’ and ‘fired up’ as well.  And the best part was, we were all on the same cake! Apply this metaphor to the quest for Truth undertaken by the founding members of Sinai 6000.

 

Rosh Hashanah marks the beginning of another year on the Jewish calendar,  their New Year.  Significantly, it also marks the founding of  Sinai 6000 as a core community of 8 ex-Christians. There were about 12 individuals who gave us a hearing at the start of our spiritual pilgrimage,  who after being convinced themselves, also eventually left their Christian roots and fellowships to get to know YHWH, the God of Israel as revealed in the Hebrew Scriptures.  Some of them continue in weekly Torah study, while the others, rationalizing that without like-minded people to affiliate within their cities of residence, the next recourse is to relearn the Torah from Jewish teachers.  Inevitably they resorted to attending Shabbat services at Synagogues where they knew they would learn the Torah. But they are still ‘Sinaites’ at the core.

 

The turnover to a new year makes one pause and ponder:

    • where am I at this time
    • so that I might determine if progress has been made
    • with increasing knowledge about our Lord YHWH,
    • with more understanding of how He works [if differently or the same?] in the lives of Jews and Gentiles, with Israel and the Nations,
    • with more spiritual enlightenment on the extent God is directly involved in the lives of believers and unbelievers alike,
    • with more wisdom gained,
    • with more shifts in my thinking,
    • enough to make a difference
    • in how I now live my life?

Reread the highlighted last two dots . . . for . . .

  • what is the purpose of acquiring information if it does not lead to knowledge of and belief in the One True God?
  • What is the use,  if none of it redounds to understanding the meaning of life and the answer not only to  ‘what on earth am I doing’
  • but more importantly to ‘what I am doing on earth’ for the remaining time the Giver of Life has allotted me in this one and only aging body that houses my essence?

For Sinai 6000,  we always look back to where we used to be on year one,  our awakening to the faith of Abraham and how our pilgrimage culminated naturally and inevitably at the mountain of divine revelation—Sinai.

Image from eileenbrown.wordpress.com

Image from eileenbrown.wordpress.com

Looking back, the awakening did not happen overnight; it was more a process, a series of simultaneous individual self-examination and group spiritual evaluation that led to the formation of a core community that would review and re-examine the roots of the religion of our birth or of choice—Christianity.  Then decide: continue in the same direction because it has been confirmed to be the right one? OR change direction if it has been confirmed to be wrong, realizing even so late in our journey of faith that we had been walking on the wrong path all along?

 

Facing that fork on the road . . . Our truth quest in the form of intense [short of obsessive]  research led us back into the Hebrew Scriptures, particularly the Torah which should have been THE ROOTS to begin with, of every sincere seeker after the One True God,   for right there in the opening verse of the first of five books attributed to Moses—is where we find the claim challenged by skeptics that earthly time began with God who first appears as Creator.

 

If there is ‘progressive revelation as Christianity claims, it is found in Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy and no further.

 

The Creator is progressively made known by nobody else but Himself, for who else except He Himself can best do it?

  • After appearing as Creator,
  • within the invention of the seven-day week, He reveals Himself as the true Lord of the Sabbath.
  • Then He interacts with the first man and woman—representative humanity—as a Wise Father, giving instructions (strangely though understandably) limited to ‘food’ for the body and within this context, the test for obedience is given in connection with one symbolic tree in the middle of the garden: “the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.”
  • From Father Figure, He turns Judge,  executing the judgment for representative humanity’s disobedience,  driven out of the garden, unable to partake of the other symbolic “Tree of Life”, a consequence clearly spelled out as “you will surely die.”
  • He speaks to troubled Cain as a Wise Counselor, with the warning:  “If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door. Its desire is contrary to you, but you must rule over it.”
  • He then reveals Himself to righteous Noah as a Merciful Savior as well as a Destroyer of evil humanity through the manipulation of natural forces that led to a worldwide flood.
  • Then He makes Himself known progressively to three generations of a chosen set-apart line,
    • no longer the mysterious unknowable universal God
    • but this time identifiable and definable from other non-gods of ignorant idolaters,
    • specifically thenceforth as “the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob”;
  • and,  when the time was ripe, as Revelator on Sinai.
  • He then self-describes to Moses:  – Exodus 34:6
    • Yahweh passed by before him, and proclaimed, “YHWH! YHWH, a merciful and gracious God, slow to anger, and abundant in loving kindness and truth . . .”
  • Eventually, He becomes the God of the divinely-formed nation of Israel,
    • their Redeemer and Deliverer,
    • their new Lord and Master,
    • their King who teaches them how to live as His subjects,
    • as a people with a distinct divinely-designed destiny,
    • chosen to model His prescribed lifestyle for all humanity.

All these are recorded in His Torah.  For what purpose?

 

Observe them faithfully,

for that will be proof of your wisdom

and discernment to other peoples,

who on hearing of all these laws will say,

‘Surely, that great nation is a wise and discerning people.’

For what great nation is there

that has a god so close at hand

as is YHWH our God whenever we call upon Him? Or what great nation has laws and rules

as perfect as all this Teaching t

hat I set before you this day? 

—-Deuteronomy 4:2, 5-7

 
Image from buelahman.wordpress.com

Image from buelahman.wordpress.com

Reading the Hebrew Scriptures with fresh eyes and through Jewish publications/translations led to a totally different perspective.   Little did we realize that translations greatly influence interpretation and thereby understanding and ultimately belief/faith/life. We discovered that if you keep reading the “Old Testament” of the Christian Bible, you will keep seeing Jesus all over it, since the mere capitalization of keywords such as “Son” for the original “son” and “Servant” for the original “servant” already influences your thinking and further reinforces the Christian perspective of “progressive revelation” and with it, the intended connection:  “OT prophecy” points to”NT fulfillment”.  There are many more differences between OT and TNK (Hebrew Scriptures) than mere translation alone!   Not the least of which are differences that are designed to change the meaning of the original Hebrew Scriptures so that eventually it does appear to supply all the ‘prooftexts’ needed to present a different reconfiguration of the One and Only True God of the Hebrew Scriptures who eventually metamorphosed into the New Testament Trinitarian version of Father-Son-Holy Spirit mystery that nobody truly understands.

 

Our quest/research also led us to reread and review the history of Christianity,

  • the roots of the faith we had mindlessly but wholeheartedly embraced,
  • the religion we were born into and inherited from our parents,
  • the religion that is predominant in our country’s culture.

 

We researched not one, not two, but as many books as are available in this no-holds-barred age of information, whether in hard copy or ebook form or available with the click of a computer key.  We researched many historical sources and documentation of how councils of men in the 4th century made major decisions on the nature of God and the nature of the figure they decided was God Himself, Jesus of Nazareth.

Image from www.pinterest.com

Image from www.pinterest.com

What???!!! Men decided God’s nature? Mere men elevated another man to divine status? Don’t take our word for it, do your homework! But first, open your mind and check out truths you swallowed without question, including everything being presented in this anniversary post.

 

You get the picture, this was not a casual reality-check but a doggedly determined investigation of everything there is available.   After all, we live in an age when this is now possible.

 

Learn to Discern

As we studied,  we tasted but did not swallow everything we read;  however, there was enough reliable consistent verifiable information to indeed finally digest after being convinced without a doubt, after processing so much information with eyes-wide-open, with minds eventually trained with discernment and wisdom.  We reasoned that if we bother to check out sources of food we eat or products we buy to determine if these adversely affect our health, all the more should we look into matters of faith, of religious beliefs, since these affect our destiny both in this life and beyond.

 

And so we read and read and read. . . a lot!  In fact more than enough,  and processed what we learned,  then decided as late as it was in our lives to change direction.  Evidence was too convincing to ignore.  As one Christian apologist titled his book, “Evidence demands a verdict,”  we the ‘jury’ reached a verdict:   change now, it is never too late!

 

In fact, change is crucial at any point in life, once more Truth has been uncovered. We would never be happy remaining in the same pathway we had already determined without a doubt, to be the wrong one.

 

A change in direction is what ‘repentance’ truly means, not simply admission and confession that one was wrong or in the wrong and yet remain unchanged.  Surprisingly, the change was not difficult to do individually, particularly when there were others to have long discussions with, for balance, for confirmation, for reinforcement of a radical shift about to be undertaken by 8 of us first, and another 6 among my Bible students, and another 6 affiliates of BAN and VAN who were instrumental in influencing them to consider Messianic Judaism and were about to admit to them they were wrong all these years!

 

The long and lonely barely trodden road . . . .

Not a surprise, many of our colleagues did not join us in backtracking to the ancient pathway that for so long, only observant Israel had trod.   Still, we felt we had an obligation to inform [though not necessarily influence] those we had converted who joined our bible studies and Christian fellowships;  peers with whom we grew and matured together in churches and fellowships where we actively took part in specific ministries. Would you believe some of us were ‘church planters’ while others pursued degrees in theology in Christian seminaries?  We were staunch defenders of the Christian faith, steeped into apologetics; we were Bible study organizers as well as teachers of New Testament theology.

 

Those who knew us would never have expected any one of us to turn ‘renegade’ for, after all, some of us were virtual ‘indoctrinators’ of new converts, devout and zealous for the propagation of the good news about salvation in Jesus Christ. Yes, we drew in many souls into the Christian fold; therefore it was our obligation to confess we had left that fold and why.  Some gave us a hearing but were hardly convinced; others simply shunned us like we were deluded and consequently irrelevant. Others were seriously concerned about our losing our salvation because we were now destined for hellfire for turning away from Christianity’s Savior and declaring the name of another God.

 

We stood our ground;  we did not ‘evangelize’, we simply stated our position to alert that we were no longer on the same page with them.  We not only turned the page, but we also moved to the next chapter; in effect, we completely dumped the ‘new’ and reinvestigated the ‘old’.

 

You see, the problem is —-as it happens in Christian conversions, the indoctrinating process is in reverse of any logical educational system. Simply put, as the song “Do Re Mi” [in The Sound of Music] prefaces,

 

“Let’s start at the very beginning,

a very good place to start,

when you read you begin with ABC,

when you sing you begin with . . .  .” 

 

Well in Christian indoctrination, one begins with—

  • first: believe in the Christian Trinitarian version of God, accept the second Person Jesus Christ the Son as Lord and Savior,
  • and next: study the New Testament, specifically the Gospel of John.  Why? Because after accepting Jesus Christ as Lord, the Holy Spirit enters you and with His [Its?] illumination, you can start understanding the Christian Bible.

In what reading system does anyone start with a sequel rather than the ‘prequel’? And so, many get stuck in the NT and never move forward, or should we say  ‘backward’ to OT . . . or farther back to the Hebrew Scriptures or the TNK.  After all, we were guilty of passing on the general teaching that  the ‘roots’ of the Christian faith,  the introduction to the ‘newer’ scriptures is passé as in obsolete, as in ‘old’, as in ‘superseded’, so why waste time studying what is only for Jews; hey, there’s enough to study in the ‘new testament’ which Christians should focus on.

 

But all that is history now.  So finally, where are we today? Just as our year by year musings, discussions and discoveries have been recorded step by step and shared in this website, here again, we are sharing the views of our core community.

 

The question we’re simply focusing every year is:

“How has my discovery of YHWH as God

and the study of His Torah

affected my thinking

and consequently changed my behavior

and my life…if at all?

 

In effect,

  • have we simply accumulated information
  • or have changes in thinking translated to behavior changes?
  • How have we lived since?
  • What is a Sinaite like today?

 

The list below represents collective answers for every Sinaite who has expressed almost the same sentiments, [amazing!] like we were of the same mind,  lit candles on the same cake, remember?

 

  1. For one, we have finally succeeded in shedding our ‘Jew-wannabe’ initial tendency, though unfortunately not our Jew-wannabe image in the eyes of others.

 

At first, we resorted to clinging to ‘everything Jewish’ because they held the ‘arrow’ pointing to the God of Israel and His Torah.  After all, what did we know at the time of transition?  We did not hold the keys to understanding the Torah.

 

So we turned to the teaching of the Jewish sages which are full of wisdom and so different from everything we have ever read and studied.  While we continue to learn from them, we have also become discerning of what is “scripturally TNK” and what is “culturally Jewish,” what is of YHWH and what is of rabbinical interpretation.

 

In time, we realized we did not have to shed our Gentile-ness nor did we need to gravitate toward Judaism.

 

2.  Gradually, we simply developed our own way of celebrating the Sabbath, incorporating what is meaningful to us from Jewish tradition and creating uniquely our own preferred way of praying and celebrating.

 

3.  We also learned what in the Torah was for Israel and was in Israel’s experience and what we could embrace as universal—the decalogue, three out of seven feasts in Leviticus 23, and the dietary prescriptions of Leviticus 11, among others.  These are expounded in articles under the heading SINAI 6000 (please check the SiteMap or Updated Site Contents)

 

4.  The best part of it is this: all of us have become more tolerant of ALL faiths, particularly the religion we left behind.

 

We totally understand Christian thinking, we thought the same way for decades!

 

If we made it out of there, we know that others who continue to seek will find Him–YHWH— and apply His prescribed Way of living in community.  Hopefully, they will find their niche in the existing faith communities that worship YHWH.

 

It does not necessarily have to be with Sinai 6000 .

  • we are not a church nor a religion;
  • we are a resource center, like many lamplighters in the darkness for sojourners who are seeking the path leading to the One True God.
  • We are a distinct way of thinking which translates to a distinct way of living;
  • anyone can agree with our perspective and consider himself one with us, even call himself a Sinaite if indeed he understands and agrees with everything we stand for.
  • We are a way of life a wee bit different from Jews but still Torah-based.
  • The difference lies in that we’re Gentiles and not Jews from whom much more is expected.
  • We’re not chosen like the Jews, we’re Gentiles who did our own choosing of the same pathway laid out for Israel by their God, YHWH.
  • We are Gentiles who chose the God of Israel, YHWH, as the God we believe is the One True and Only God;
  • He didn’t exactly choose us, but we chose Him, isn’t that so much better?

5.  We insist that THE pathway leads to Sinai, a neutral territory and not to Jerusalem which indeed is associated with Israel, and definitely not to Rome, the birthplace of Christianity.

 

6.  Even better, not only have we become more tolerant but we have become less judgmental as well.

 

Are they not one and the same?  One could be outwardly tolerant but still inwardly judgmental.

 

  Sinaites do not think we have a monopoly of the Truth and that everyone else is wrong; that we are “saved” and everyone else is “damned” and headed for hellfire.  In fact, we no longer think in terms of “saved” and “unsaved” as per our Christian orientation.

 

7.   We think in simple terms:  “Who is the God I worship?” and “how do I express my love for Him?”

 

8.  We don’t think “religion” but rather “relationship” and that makes a big difference in how we conduct ourselves, particularly in relation to people of other faiths.

 

9.  Like the Jews, we believe in ‘live and let live.’  Respect the faith choice of each person but pray that he keeps seeking and finds more light, for our God is far bigger than any of us even collectively, can ever conceive.

 

10.   “In my simple thinking” as one of our most senior affiliates  prefaces her opinion, the Sinaite’s faith walk has become so simple, even a child can easily relate to it:

 

—-love and worship YHWH as Creator and Revelator;

 

—-then live His Torah as best as we can,  even and specially in a Torah-less cultural context and Torah-unobservant society.

 

Torah is do-able; it is all simply a matter of choice and the will to ‘do’ or ‘don’t do.’

 

11.    After determining where evil comes from according to the Hebrew Scriptures, we eliminated finger-pointing which often lays the blame for sin on non-existent evil figures such as the Devil and his demonic cohorts.

 

Knowing that every human being is endowed with free will, then every choice to do right or wrong has its automatic consequences.

 

Evil is the consequence of individual decisions not to live God’s Way and instead live ‘my way’.  When SELF predominates and rules behavior, it manifests in as many ways as there are self-centered individuals whose selfish motives add up to total disregard for anyone else on this planet. It is evident in traffic, crimes, domestic violence, corruption in government, etc., where the strong overpower the weak, where those in privileged positions take advantage of the underprivileged, and so on.

 

Ignorance is no longer an excuse not to know what the Lord YHWH has taught in His Torah.  The will to know should lead anyone to find information on anything, the choice to do is up to him. Choosing to remain ignorant is a choice, and unfortunately, there are consequences on society in general when people think of self only with total disregard for others.

 

But we also believe that there is an inherent, inborn knowledge of what is good and right and just in every person born; we see this in the lives of the non-religious, in agnostics and atheists who actually live the Torah life.  After all, YHWH did say He will write His law in the hearts of humanity.

 

12.   We have become NOW-centered, as in ‘this is the only life I have for the time I am allotted on this earth’ — I will live to make a difference in the NOW.

 

In fact, the NOW is fleeting every second so do as much good as we can for others as well as for ourselves, always at the moment, as opportunity arises.

 

We don’t think in terms of earning points for the world beyond– ‘heaven’ the destination of Christ-believers.

 

We are not other-world oriented; this world is all we know, for now, this world is where we make a difference for our God YHWH, and our fellowmen.

 

As my non-religious father said, “my religion is to be good and to do good.” Good as in ‘right’, according to God’s standard of right and wrong.  Sounds simple enough.

 

 A surprise bonus in health

Last but not least, we have learned healthy living from the Genesis diet (plant-based) as well as the Leviticus diet (clean animals).  The longer we can live in good health, the more we can enjoy our lives, be of good use to our fellow-beings and be used of God.  Stress has been identified as a huge factor in causing all kinds of diseases, particularly cancer.  Eating healthy stuff gets sidetracked in the digestive system when stress hinders proper digestion when cells and pores are closed and can’t do their proper work.  What causes stress?  Faulty relationships, causing ‘the other’ hurt and harm. Nine days prior to Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement is a reminder to set all our relationships right.  Never mind if the ‘other’ does not respond or is negative, ‘just do it!’, clear your record and set it right from your side.

 

Finally,  may the Giver of Life, the Source of our breath of life, give us Sinaites more time and opportunity to serve Him, from Sabbath to Sabbath and all the days between until we reach our Final Sabbath of eternal rest.

 

Oh YHWH, God of Sinaites, we thank You

—for snatching us out of our bondage to a man-made religion that did not issue from You,

—that taught us to worship a different God that was not You,

—that negated  Your Torah as ‘done away with’,

—that replaced Your chosen people with a ‘New Israel’,

—that replaced Your ‘son’ with a ‘Son’ elevated to divine status, equal to You, and more worshipped than You.  

Thank You, Lord YHWH,

for delivering us from idolatry

and leading us back to the ancient path

which we are now treading with observant Israel.

May our individual ‘book of life’

and the ‘saga of Sinai 6000’s journey’

continue to draw spiritually awakened Gentiles

who are seeking an alternative between Christianity and Judaism,

that they may be led to You

and Your Revelation on Sinai,

a Way of living for all people, Jew and Gentile.

May it be so!

 

On behalf of the original Sinai 6000 Core Community,

those who celebrate the Sabbath in earth time . . .

and those who graduated to their final Sabbath Rest.

 

Sig-4_16colors

 

 

 

 

logo

Sig-4_16colors

 

 

Q&A: Could the first 2 generations of humanity have avoided disobeying the Creator’s simple instructions specific to their situation?

Image from www.relatably.com

Image from www.relatably.com

[This is an excerpt from a revisited post that is so long that perhaps readers don’t bother reading to the very end.  Except that this was at the beginning of the discourse, and if you’re curious, here’s the link for the complete discussion which is worth  your patience and time, promise: 

What prompted culling this excerpt out of the complete post is a judgmental attitude prevalent in the ‘self-righteous’ among us who posit that they would have done better than the first couple had they been the ones tested in Eden.   Oh yeah? Easy to say in hindsight, with wisdom gained from mistakes of others.  

 

The Rabbis teach that one should not judge another unless one has walked in that person’s shoes;  meaning, we should never compare ourselves and presume how much better we would react under the same circumstances because there are many factors involved in any peculiar situation; then,  factor in the personalities involved the story/incident. Perhaps I should write a sequel to this post titled “What if I were Adam or Eve?”  Well guess what, Mark Twain has done exactly that.  Check out his ‘take’ on the progressive education of the first male and female in :  The Diaries of Adam and Eve which  we will soon feature in our MUST READ category.   Meanwhile, learn from this excerpt— it drives home our point about the universality of human curiosity and not listening to wise words even if the source is YHWH Himself!  Just look at the state of affairs all over the world today, does it look like we have learned from the lessons of history, or the Bible, eh? And that today’s generation is wiser than all our forbears?—-Admin1

 

———————

 

Why did the Omniscient Creator have to give the first couple a commandment He knew would be disobeyed?

 

Specific instruction such as that given to Adam and Eve was intended to test that gift of free will they might not even have been conscious of at that time.

 

If everything in Eden was perfect, who could possibly want more than that ideal life?

 

Name the animals, tend the garden, eat only seed-bearing fruit, interact with this invisible Presence Who speaks to us. That should be simple enough and easy to do. What a life!

 

But the problem is, Adam and Eve knew no other kind of life, they probably hadn’t even realized that they had it so good!

 

You know that saying “the grass is greener on the other side?”  In fact, food tastes better at our neighbor’s dinner table even if it isn’t so, it’s just different from what we’re used to.  It is part of human nature to be curious, and think “what else am I missing?”  Until we fall or lose what we had, we don’t appreciate.

 

So Adam and Eve are given so many do’s and only one don’t, with an ‘or else’!

 

Strangely, this early on in the unfolding biblical story, there was no mention of blessing for obedience, understandably, for what else could they possibly need or want in Eden? Presumably, they had already dealt with all the ‘do’s’!

 

The one and only ‘don’t command was specific regarding not eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.  We know how that story ended, so the simple lesson to be learned in hindsight is obey whatever God commands, no ifs and buts!

 

If the Creator says so, DO SO!  For more discussions of the first couple’s disobedience,  check out these posts:

 

 

Image from Pinterest

Image from Pinterest

And now to 2nd generation Cain; why could Cain not have learned from the mistakes of the First Parents?

 

If the first couple shared their loss of Eden [and why] to firstborn Cain to teach him that hard-learned lesson, Cain failed to ‘get it’.   Why?

 

  • To begin with, he couldn’t  relate to the tree that got his parents in trouble; he was born and raised out of Eden where life is difficult.  Besides, what kind of tree is called “knowledge of good and evil” and what kind of fruit does it bear? Who would believe there is even such a tree?
  • Secondly, Cain  had to deal with his own personal circumstances—back-breaking toil to get something growing to offer his parents’ God.  Remember, that is part of the curse on Adam, out of Eden where everything is provided, no more easy life, work for your food from now on!
  • Thirdly, that same God who expelled his parents out of their original home was now showing favoritism, not appreciating the fruit of Cain’s toil from the soil as He was with the offering of Abel.
  • Fourthly, he’s now struggling with resentment, even anger toward this younger brother who obviously outshone him.  Ever experienced those two hard-to-overcome emotions?  Sibling rivalry was born here and continued through the next generations.
  • The warning God gave Cain would be a general teaching not only to Cain but to all humanity, about uncontrolled sinful tendencies that could and should be curbed if only we would.
  • For a more thorough discussion of Cain, heres’ a post:

 

Did disobedience of the Creator’s commands end with Cain?   Meaning, everyone else lived happily ever after, having learned hard lessons from Adam & Eve & firstborn?   At that time, the instructions were quite simple, right?  What’s so difficult about  ‘do not eat the forbidden fruit’ and ‘watch out for sin crouching at your door’?    Alas, those two basic instructions have been violated from the first generation to our times, six millennia later.

 

Ask yourself:

  • What ‘forbidden fruit’ are you struggling with?
  • Have you opened the door to ‘sin crouching out there’?
  • If you had kept the door shut, would you have been much happier?
  • Or still curious?

 

   NSB@S6K

AIbEiAIAAABDCNPkvrXuucmdeSILdmNhcmRfcGhvdG8qKGJkZTc0YTk3NmUxMGM4OTAzZjk5MDhkMjdkZDI2ODQ3OTliYmQ2MDkwAe5UdNp0lvYvCf8bjAFEJOY_fdsj

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sig-4_16colors

 

THE TORAH – GENESIS/Chapter by Chapter

Image from www.knanayaregion.us

Image from www.knanayaregion.us

[Every new day is 

a good time 

for starting anew.  Every new day, one could consciously decide to return to foundational truth,

the basics in bible study . . .

so here’s the Book of Beginnings,

the first of the Five Books of Moses,

known as the TORAH,

Instructions for Living,

Guidelines for Life,

conveniently listed for the serious student,

a product of Sinaites’ final reorientation

to the Sinai Revelation.

—Admin1]

 

 

————————–

 

 

GENESIS/BERESHITH

SINAI 6000 COMMENTARY

 

THE TORAH – EXODUS/Chapter by Chapter

[This is still a work in progress, not complete in terms of the commentary we wish to add to the biblical text, specifically the translation of Everett Fox.  It is complete however, in terms of the text for searchers who simply wish to read this official translation we have chosen for our website. —Admin1]

 

—————————

 

 

Exodus/Shemoth

A Sinaite’s Dissertation on the Book of Exodus

[In Memoriam — These posts were authored by Sinaite ELZ when she chose to write her doctoral dissertation on the book of Exodus.  She passed her orals; she finished her Ph.D. She contributed many more articles for Sinai6000.net.  Even if they have passed away, we honor both ELZ and VAN by reposting their articles every year when the season/celebration is relevant.  We certainly miss them both, who have left us on this side of eternity and moved on to their final Sabbath Rest.—Admin1.]

 

 

CHAPTERS

 

SINAI 6000 COMMENTARY

THE TORAH – LEVITICUS/Chapter by Chapter

[This is a work in progress; incomplete in terms of the commentary we wish to add to the text from our 3 sources: Pentateuch and Haftorah, Everett Fox, Robert Alter.  It is complete however in terms of the chapter-by-chapter translation of Everett Fox’s THE FIVE BOOKS OF MOSES.–Admin1]

—————————–  

Leviticus/Waiqrah

CHAPTERS

 

THE TORAH – NUMBERS/Chapter by Chapter

[This is a work in progress; it simply features the text from the translation of our choice, Everett Fox’s THE FIVE BOOKS OF MOSES, a must-read/must-own biblical resource.  As we keep repeating, the reason it is our choice is because unlike Hebrew translations which do not print ‘the Name YHWH’ and substitute “LORD” or “HASHEM”, Everett Fox has no qualms using the sacred Name YHWH where it appears in the original.  For this, we are thankful to him and feature his work, urging others to get your personal copy of his translation.—Admin1]

 

——————–

 

 

Numbers/Bemidbar